[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #11 from Gustavo Stachera --- (In reply to Joshua Lipstone from comment #8) > Can you please either undo this or change it so that the Jars are only > scanned if they match the inclusion filter. > As of 9.0.30, if you wanted to set

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #10 from quaff --- (In reply to Joshua Lipstone from comment #8) > Can you please either undo this or change it so that the Jars are only > scanned if they match the inclusion filter. > As of 9.0.30, if you wanted to set the logic

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Joshua Lipstone changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2020-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Christopher Schultz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Beginner -- You are receiving

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #6 from Mark

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #5 from Igal Sapir --- (In reply to Chuck Caldarale from comment #4) > Could the standard jar scanner recognize the "*.jar" pattern and simply > short-circuit all the directory scanning? I can see benefit in that solution for

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #4 from Chuck Caldarale --- Could the standard jar scanner recognize the "*.jar" pattern and simply short-circuit all the directory scanning? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- It is a balance. I'm on the fence as to whether this is worth adding or not. If you think it adds value then I'm not going to object. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #2 from Igal Sapir --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1) > Why not just do > > System.setProperty("tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanFilter.jarsToSkip","*. > jar") ? IIRC then that still reads the directories and then

[Bug 63691] Add a no-op JarScanner

2019-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas