https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to dingli from comment #13)
> F5 can send HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 request in http monitor. but ths stupid
> thing is the default setting is HTTP/0.9
>
> we have change the F5 setting last
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #15 from mgrigorov ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to
> still have it (clients which insist would still get something back).
+1 from me too.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #14 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #10)
> I fail to see the problem so I added a test case to test HTTP/0.9 support
> (using "GET /CRLF"), and it works for me.
yesterday I can reproduce
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #13 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Remy Maucherat from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #12 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #11)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> > > Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> > Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to
> > still have it (clients
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
I fail to see the problem so I added a test case to test HTTP/0.9 support
(using "GET /CRLF"), and it works for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #9 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #8 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #7)
> (In reply to dingli from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> > > Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #7 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to dingli from comment #6)
> (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> > Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to
> > still have it (clients which insist
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #6 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to
> still have it (clients which insist would still get something back).
It
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #4)
> Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to
> still have it (clients which insist would still get something back).
+1 for this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat ---
Why is 0.9 support not removed by now ? It sounds *quite* ridiculous to still
have it (clients which insist would still get something back).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #3 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Tomcat tightened up the HTTP 0.9 parsing. It looks like there is an issue
> with requests of the form:
>
> GET / LF
>
> Prior to the parsing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #2 from dingli <382188...@qq.com> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Tomcat tightened up the HTTP 0.9 parsing. It looks like there is an issue
> with requests of the form:
>
> GET / LF
>
> Prior to the parsing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
18 matches
Mail list logo
