Re: [Proposal] mod_jk lb changes

2006-04-13 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Good news. Will you cut another mod_jk version close to 5.5.17 (it will be to late for that one), or are you planning to keep 1.2.16 in development for at least 1-2 weeks further on? We had a preliminary vote two weeks ago, and everyone agreed to go for the 1.2.16, so if

Re: [Proposal] mod_jk lb changes

2006-04-13 Thread Rainer Jung
OK, I expect to send the patches late Friday german time (tomorrow, but in 3 minutes today). Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Good news. Will you cut another mod_jk version close to 5.5.17 (it will be to late for that one), or are you planning to keep 1.2.16 in development for at least

[Proposal] mod_jk lb changes

2006-04-12 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi List, hi Mladen (master of mod_jk): a year ago we changed to algorithm in mod_jk, that counts weighted requests in the lb worker to decide, which balanced worker should receive the next request. The new algorithm three main advantages: a) using only integers b) using only a limited range