On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
If more info is needed to debug the problem, please let me know.
No more info needed at the moment.
I can re-create the problem.
The issues appear to be related to the changes I made to support
non-blocking IO with AJP so they should be limited
On 16/12/2013 14:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
If more info is needed to debug the problem, please let me know.
No more info needed at the moment.
I can re-create the problem.
The additional issues I thought I was seeing were user error rather
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 3:44 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC7
On 16/12/2013 14:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:28 AM
The proposed 8.0.0-RC7 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC7 alpha
While the issue with large static files that I
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 1:53 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC7
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I'm receiving NPE when testing an application with jsp that specifies tld
location with relative path:
java.lang.NullPointerException
org.apache.jasper.compiler.TldCache.getTaglibXml(TldCache.java:97)
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used, the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we check only for WEB-INF/tags
[1], what should be
On 13/12/2013 14:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used, the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we check
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used,
the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Unfortunately with that fix I'm receiving FNF:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /META-INF/tags/my.tag
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.loadTagFile(JspServletWrapper.java:235)
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Unfortunately with that fix I'm receiving FNF:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /META-INF/tags/my.tag
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.loadTagFile(JspServletWrapper.java:235)
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Here [1] is the test
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/3zd106lpqfb3ytv/test.zip
Fixed. I didn't add the test yet since I suppose adding a binary should be
avoided.
Rémy
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Here [1] is the test
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/3zd106lpqfb3ytv/test.zip
Fixed. I didn't add the test yet since I suppose adding a binary should be
avoided.
Thanks it is working now.
On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On 2013-12-11 6:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC7 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC7 alpha
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 11/12/2013 23:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the WebSocket 1.0 implementation
- Refactor
On 11/12/2013 23:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
21 matches
Mail list logo
