DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Matafagafo matafag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.21 |trunk --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #62 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2012-03-16 00:54:29 UTC --- Just a note: Backport of WebSockets support to Tomcat 6 is tracked separately as bug #52918 -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #60 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-12 21:59:38 UTC --- Created attachment 28457 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28457 Chat example collision fix and cleanup Please find attached patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #57 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-06 15:15:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #56) Created attachment 28420 [details] Multiplayer snake example Brilliant. Simply brilliant. I did clean up a few warnings and reduced

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #58 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-06 21:54:46 UTC --- Created attachment 28426 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28426 Multiplayer snake collision fix Thanks for taking the time to fix

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #59 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-06 22:21:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #58) Created attachment 28426 [details] Multiplayer snake collision fix Thanks for taking the time to fix the warnings, formatting and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28416|0 |1 is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 r...@thelightfamily.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@thelightfamily.com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #52 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-04 12:12:58 UTC --- Created attachment 28415 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28415 Connection close not called on IOE I am able to continually produce

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #53 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-04 14:25:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #52) Created attachment 28415 [details] Connection close not called on IOE I fixed this slightly differently in trunk, mainly because I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #54 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-05 00:48:11 UTC --- Created attachment 28416 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28416 Multiplayer snake example Please find attached patch for simple

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #55 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-05 00:51:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #53) (In reply to comment #52) Created attachment 28415 [details] Connection close not called on IOE I fixed this slightly

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #48 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-02 12:53:06 UTC --- Created attachment 28410 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28410 Improved echo example Please find attached proposal for improved

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28408|0 |1 is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #50 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-02 19:10:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #49) Created attachment 28411 [details] Overrides for connection open and close Patch applied (with some minor tweaks). Many thanks. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #51 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-02 19:15:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #48) Created attachment 28410 [details] Improved echo example Patch applied. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #46 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-01 19:13:34 UTC --- Created attachment 28408 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28408 Overrides for connection open and close I am currently working on an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #47 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-03-02 01:57:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #46) Created attachment 28408 [details] Overrides for connection open and close I am currently working on an example for websockets.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #44 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-29 15:12:41 UTC --- Created attachment 28407 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28407 Introduce status code constants Please find attached proposal of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #45 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-29 20:56:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #44) Please find attached proposal of introducing status code constants instead of using magic numbers everywhere, also contains some typo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #41 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-28 11:43:52 UTC --- Created attachment 28396 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28396 Autobahn websocket report Thought it might be interesting to try out

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28396|Autobahn websocket report |Autobahn fail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #42 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-28 11:56:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) Thought it might be interesting to try out Autobahn with latest trunk (r1294541) on a couple of different platforms to see how things

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #40 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-23 12:42:40 UTC --- The bulk of the implementation is complete in trunk and should be at a stage where folks can take it out for a spin. Keep in mind it is far from final. One of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #39 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-19 16:35:14 UTC --- Short update for folks not following the dev list. - added fragmented packet support - added *very* basic test client -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #36 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-16 17:47:38 UTC --- Created attachment 28342 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28342 Fragmentation control frames Attaching patch sent by Petr Praus

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #37 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-16 22:35:46 UTC --- I can see the possible requirement for access to the request headers when verifying the origin (and a few other processes). However, I'm leaning towards not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #38 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-16 23:30:35 UTC --- I am extremely reluctant to apply the current fragmentation patch. It relies on buffering individual fragments and - given the maximum fragment size - that is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #35 from Lucas Dreyer luc4sdre...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 13:53:52 UTC --- +1, Tomcat is an integral part of our system and Web Socket support will be awesome. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #33 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2012-02-10 09:45:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the request in order to determine / set the initial state of the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #34 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-10 11:20:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) Given that these are potentially long running requests, keeping the original request object around might not be such a good idea.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #32 from Adam Walczak m...@adamwalczak.info 2012-02-09 23:53:16 UTC --- PS. Oracle just put out JSR-356 for WebSockect: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=356 might come in handy for this issue -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #30 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-08 08:33:37 UTC --- The origin changes look good. I'll incorporate them shortly. Regarding the changes to createWebSocketInbound, I understand passing the protocol but why pass the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #31 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-08 10:37:53 UTC --- Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the request in order to determine / set the initial state of the socket or application. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jo...@sulake.com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #29 from Johno Crawford jo...@sulake.com 2012-02-04 01:48:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28264 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28264 Origin and protocol client handshake TODOs Thought it might be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #28 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-02-01 10:13:31 UTC --- An initial implementation has been added to trunk. Once the major TODOs have been addressed, it will be back-ported to 7.0.x. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 nada apache_bugzi...@valgronda.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #27 from Toub n.toubl...@gmail.com 2012-01-20 22:36:59 UTC --- Thanks for the report! Will try to deal with embedded jetty until a first version is released. Definitely a must-have feature in Tomcat. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Toub n.toubl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n.toubl...@gmail.com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 David Corley davidcor...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-01-18 22:35:07 UTC --- I dug out my old ideas and have been updating them. You can see how far I have got in [1]. Note that this is all very early days and pretty much everything is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #25 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2012-01-10 09:35:09 UTC --- // WebSocket event processor public void event(WebSocketEvent event) throws IOException, ServletException { WebSocketServletRequest request =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-01-08 13:03:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Is there any estimate when WebSockets support will be implemented? No. The preparatory work of aligning the connectors is pretty much

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #24 from gober...@msn.com 2012-01-08 22:38:44 UTC --- I actually played with Jetty WebSocket API last Friday and was able to embed it into Tomcat quite easily. The only issue is that it has to be on a separate port. As I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 gober...@msn.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gober...@msn.com -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #22 from gober...@msn.com 2012-01-05 22:33:32 UTC --- Mark, Is there any estimate when WebSockets support will be implemented? As far as API, I would not mind if it is somewhat similar to the Comet functionality. In fact it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #21 from r...@symentis.com 2011-12-23 14:49:21 UTC --- +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Stein Morten Hugubakken stein.morten.hugubak...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #18 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2011-11-10 11:56:01 UTC --- Monsoon seems to have stalled somewhat -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 jfclere jfcl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jfcl...@gmail.com --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #17 from jfclere jfcl...@gmail.com 2011-11-09 21:13:06 UTC --- See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/labs/monsoon/trunk/ too -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #16 from Manuel Vergel manuel_i...@yahoo.com 2011-10-18 10:00:11 UTC --- + 1 too. Greatly needed in my new projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Mike Slinn msl...@mslinn.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.12 |7.0.21 --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #14 from Harikrishnadhas Krishnaraj harikrishnadha...@capgemini.com 2011-09-26 13:06:20 UTC --- I'm Eagerly looking out tomcat to implement the Web Socket -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 mike_mac mike_mac...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-09-06 23:15:59 UTC --- It might appear that there hasn't been much progress on this but there has been a lot going on behind the scenes. 1. The HTTP connectors have been refactored to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-07-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 raosiy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raosiy...@163.com --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #12 from gootd...@gmail.com 2011-06-30 02:23:31 UTC --- Please add Web Sockets to Tomcat. The functionality provided is incredible and finally allows our applications to provide real time communication. Instead of resorting to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #11 from Antoine Roux antoine.r...@net-vitesse.com 2011-05-26 20:07:48 UTC --- Hi, This is definitely something I would love to see in Tomcat! Websockets will allow to build richer web application and all major browsers already

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #10 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2011-05-22 20:29:54 UTC --- I can't have you polluting this thread with misinformation. Maybe you need a superinjunction. ;) -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #7 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org 2011-05-20 14:39:57 UTC --- true, web sockets are really nothing more than comet, with some additional packet info, and that could be deal with using an InputFilter -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #8 from Nikolas nikolasarmstr...@gmail.com 2011-05-20 15:34:44 UTC --- @Mark Thomas If practical. Heh @Filip Hanik It is not the same thing as Comet, clearly you've never actually done any development with Comet or Websockets.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #9 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org 2011-05-20 22:20:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) @Filip Hanik It is not the same thing as Comet, clearly you've never actually done any development with Comet or Websockets. I can't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-05-19 11:04:46 UTC --- Current thinking on this is that Tomcat would provide the SocketIO API in a similar manner to how Comet is supported. The underlying transports, e.g web sockets,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Graeme Rocher graeme.roc...@springsource.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Add support for HTML5 Web |Add