Getting back to this. Comments in-line.
On 23/05/2011 22:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/5/20 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
All,
I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
(although there are
How about calling it getDependantsMap() instead of getDependants() ?
Then catch the NoSuchMethodException (I in the case where the compiled jsp
doesn't have getDependants() and that would force a recompile (and then the
new version would be OK)
-Tim
On 5/20/2011 12:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
2011/5/20 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
All,
I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
(although there are simple work-arounds). I have a patch [2] but I don't
particularly like the fact that it
All,
I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
(although there are simple work-arounds). I have a patch [2] but I don't
particularly like the fact that it breaks binary compatibility with JSPs
