oes not match
>>>>> [0-9]{1,9}(\.[0-9]{1,9}(\.[0-9]{1,9}(\.[0-9A-Za-z_-]+)?)?)?
>>>>> [bnd]
>>>>> /development/pivotal/cloudfoundry/spring-projects/graal/tomcat10/res/bnd/annotations-api.jar.tmp.bnd:
>>>>> bnd failed
>>>>> [bnd
Auge mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM
*To:* Tomcat Developers List
mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>>
*Subject:* Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated:
s/graal/tomcat10/res/bnd/annotations-api.jar.tmp.bnd:
>>>> bnd failed
>>>> [bnd] at
>>>> aQute.bnd.ant.BndTask.executeBackwardCompatible(BndTask.java:240)
>>>> [bnd] at aQute.bnd.ant.BndTask.execute(BndTask.java:119)
>>>>
d] at
>>> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292)
>>>
>>> Filip
>>>
>>>
>>> - Ray
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:21 PM Filip Hanik wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>&g
pache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292)
>>
>> Filip
>>
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:21 PM Filip Hanik wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Ra
t;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Raymond Auge
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM
>> *To:* Tomcat Developers List
>> *Subject:* Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error
>>
>>
>>
>> k, so travis config is bork
: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling
error
k, so travis config is borked.. I should add github actions.
*//*
I don’t think Travis tests artifact generation
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:13 PM Raymond Auge
mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>>
`ant test` transitively invokes `deploy` target which builds the artifacts.
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:21 PM Filip Hanik wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Raymond Auge
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM
> *To:* Tomcat Developers List
> *Subject:* Re: [tomcat] bra
From: Raymond Auge
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error
k, so travis config is borked.. I should add github actions.
I don’t think Travis tests artifact generation
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020
k, so travis config is borked.. I should add github actions.
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:13 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:09 PM Raymond Auge
> wrote:
>
>> Also, at the root of 9.0.x I hard coded the value of:
>>
>
> of course I meant HEAD
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:09 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> Also, at the root of 9.0.x I hard coded the value of:
>
of course I meant HEAD (caed3194b48ccbbac0572417b0e60807683a8690)
I'm not sure what you're missing. But it builds in CI does it not?
- Ray
>
> Bundle-Version:
Also, at the root of 9.0.x I hard coded the value of:
Bundle-Version: ${version_cleanup;9.0.0-native-image-dev}
and the result was no error and bundles have:
Bundle-Version: 9.0.0.native-image-dev
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:02 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> See
From: Raymond Auge
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error
This is not a good fix. This is the same problem we had before with
incompatible version syntax in OSGi
- Ray
Hi Ray, I can’t even
See https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:57 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> This is not a good fix. This is the same problem we had before with
> incompatible version syntax in OSGi.
>
> - Ray
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:54 PM wrote:
>
>> This is an
This is not a good fix. This is the same problem we had before with
incompatible version syntax in OSGi.
- Ray
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:54 PM wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> fhanik pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
> in repository
15 matches
Mail list logo
