On 15/05/2019 13:48, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Oki, I can hear it is a lot of work for a small gain, however, at least,
> it is possible to ensure the disable method is re-callable (actually
> setting the registry instance) and that there is an enableRegistry()
> method. It is ok and cheap IMO
Oki, I can hear it is a lot of work for a small gain, however, at least, it
is possible to ensure the disable method is re-callable (actually setting
the registry instance) and that there is an enableRegistry() method. It is
ok and cheap IMO to have a global reference counting and force it to be
On 15/05/2019 10:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 9.0.20 got a disableRegistry method in Registry class (for JMX server
> interaction),
> I wonder if it is possible to enhance it a bit to make it instance bound
> to the server instead of being global.
>
> It would enable to start/stop/restart
Hi guys,
9.0.20 got a disableRegistry method in Registry class (for JMX server
interaction),
I wonder if it is possible to enhance it a bit to make it instance bound to
the server instead of being global.
It would enable to start/stop/restart servers potentially
deactivating/activating JMX
