Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

Thanks for the update. Good work! On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:07 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've > been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10). > > The results can be summarised as: > > Expression

Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

On 23/11/2020 19:57, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Given the alpha/beta/stable definition from [1], 10.0.x now clearly >> meets the criteria for beta and some may consider it meets the criteria >> for stable. With that in mind the next 10.0.x

Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

On 23/11/2020 19:29, Martin Grigorov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, 17:07 Mark Thomas wrote: >> It is worth noting the Jakarta EE 9 only targetted Java 8. Current >> planning is that a Jakarta EE 9.1 release will target Java 11 support >> (while retaining Java 8 compatibility). This is

Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Given the alpha/beta/stable definition from [1], 10.0.x now clearly > meets the criteria for beta and some may consider it meets the criteria > for stable. With that in mind the next 10.0.x release vote will include > options for broken, beta

Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, 17:07 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've > been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10). > > The results can be summarised as: > > Expression Language >- Passes apart from

Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

Hi all, Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10). The results can be summarised as: Expression Language - Passes apart from the API signature test because we use BND annotations for

Re: EE 8 / 9 TCK status

No I did not. Thanks for the pointer. I'll check it out Le mar. 17 nov. 2020 à 10:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi JL, > > did you check > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Jakarta+EE+TCKs out? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog

Re: EE 8 / 9 TCK status

Hi JL, did you check https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Jakarta+EE+TCKs out? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github |

EE 8 / 9 TCK status

Hello community, I'm working on the TCK in the TomEE project which leverages Tomcat. I was running the TCK and I realized JSTL/JSP/Servlet/WebSockets aren't 100% green. I'm questioning my setup. That's why I wanted to ask if you guys spent time running the TCK against Tomcat. And if yes, is

Re: TCK status

On 08/10/2020 20:23, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 10/3/20 14:39, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I mentioned TCK status during a couple of ApacheCon presentations. >> Having checked the current status I thought it would be worth sending a >&

Re: TCK status

Mark, On 10/3/20 14:39, Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned TCK status during a couple of ApacheCon presentations. > Having checked the current status I thought it would be worth sending a > brief note to the list. More detail is on the wiki: > https://cwiki.apa

Re: TCK status

Thanks Mark for the update. Some specs are final already. Some are still being worked on, like WebSocket which is a bit late at the moment. If you are willing to help on this one, feel free to jump in. Le sam. 3 oct. 2020 à 20:39, Mark Thomas a écrit : > Hi all, > > I mentioned T

TCK status

Hi all, I mentioned TCK status during a couple of ApacheCon presentations. Having checked the current status I thought it would be worth sending a brief note to the list. More detail is on the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Jakarta+EE+TCKs The short version is: - EL