Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? s We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Contrawise, why wait, and why a tag? Usually most efforts (in order to preserve history) branch from trunk or branches, whereas tags/* reflect an endpoint (end of history). Simply branch from 6.0.x unless there are dirty secrets buried in there

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk Changes to

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Peter Rossbach
Good point +1 Peter Am 01.11.2007 um 09:51 schrieb jean-frederic clere: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. he he, I think

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:03 +, Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15

Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-10-06 Thread Mark Thomas
After the latest round of comments, the plan is: Tag 6.0.15 early next week. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15