Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]
There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhows, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. OK? +1 I could give RM a go if that works for ya'll - I've done a dry run already to find where everything goes. cheers tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]
On 25.05.2011 00:15, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, I'm not sure what the policy is on documentation changes and back-porting to already-released versions of mod_jk, but this clarifies how mod_jk works and would be beneficial to have on the web site without having to wait for a new release of mod_jk. Is there a good way to do that, or should we just wait for a new release? Thanks, -chris In some cases we updated that part of the site manually before a release. Especially since this doen't document anything not available in the latest release. Unfortunately the same page was changed by my http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1078805 documenting a new feature for 1.2.32. There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhows, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. OK? Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]
Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. -chris signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]
On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. Someone looking at the IPV6 patch (BZ 43968)? Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]
On 05/26/2011 04:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. Someone looking at the IPV6 patch (BZ 43968)? I had a glimpse look, and will test that next week if no one beats me. Cheers -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
