rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2071591900
Thanks @Sollder1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
rzo1 merged PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomee.apache.org
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2068705126
Just running a build with the updated TCK (the 3.1.5 isn't available yet on
Maven, raised https://github.com/jakartaee/rest/issues/1260, but if the CI
looks fine (with the failures expected),
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067721440
> We are a container env, so I guess it's save to exclude ;-)
I would agree, I excluded the test with a matching explanation.
I also exluded the tck-sig-test for now, as it
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067711072
We are a container env, so I guess it's save to exclude ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067709937
Results are pretty much the same, for the matter of SeBootstrap it states in
the jdoc:
> The SeBootstrap class is available in a Jakarta EE container environment
as well; however,
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067703137
> I am bascially thinking of adding the failing tests into exclusions (for
now) and open related Jira issues for it, so we get the setup into "main"
pretty soon.
Ok cool, I just
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067685958
I am bascially thinking of adding the failing tests into exclusions (for
now) and open related Jira issues for it, so we get the setup into "main"
pretty soon.
--
This is an automated
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2067685493
Can you do a rebase of your branch? `main` is now on cxf 4.1.x + Java 17
baseline (with all fixes needed for it). I will have a look at the TCK next.
--
This is an automated message from
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-2059735942
It seems like the guys from cxf have a 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT build and deployed
here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/cxf/cxf-core/4.1.0-SNAPSHOT/
It seems
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1900042452
Sounds good, I will try another build later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1899977038
They are still in the process of working on it, but with Jetty 12 another
obstacle is tackled here: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1633
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1802406913
Ok, I ran the tests locally with an apache-cxf build from here
https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/CXF-8671
No changes to the results, the same tests work and fail as before.
--
This
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1802330456
Hey @rzo1 That sounds great, I merged the changes and will look at the 4.1.0
asap. It seems like they did not yet build a version, but I will try to build
it from sources myself.
--
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1801792168
It also looks like the CXF guys have a 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT targeting EE10
(https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1201#issuecomment-1788967288) available, so
perhaps worth a try to upgrade within and
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1801263043
Hey @Sollder11 , just merged the EE10 API branch, etc. - can you do a
rebase? ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1344197915
##
tck/jax-rs-signature-test/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1744855945
I wrote a mail to dev@ related to the owb4 work and how to proceed with our
ee10 efforts without breaking to much (as using ee10 apis + cdi 4 has some
drawbacks in other dependencies as well)
rzo1 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1344009295
##
tck/jax-rs-signature-test/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1744849665
No, not yet, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/CXF-8671
I have a branch with EE10 apis + owb4, which also suffers from EE10 removals
in the CXF field ;-)
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1744826566
Hi Richard, I added another module for the Signature-test. It seems to run
fine and output a sig-file similar to that generated by cdi-signature-test. Any
news from the cxf Team about a
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1709033861
Perhaps time to sent a mail to dev@ - looks like those tests are all
EE10/JAX-RS 3.1 related.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1709000609
Fixed the issue with the user, they go through now... interestingly enough,
the config necessary has almost nothing to do with what is described in the
documentation. My last run now
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1708911182
So... just added another property so it looks like
```bash
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR] JAXRSClientIT.:59->usersetup:97 user not set ==> expected:
but was:
[ERROR]
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1708904761
>The issue was related to source/jar building in the module, which we
actually do not need.
Oh, I see, makes sense.
>So for me it now looks like this:
Same
>I
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-170377
The issue was related to source/jar building in the module, which we
actually do not need.
So for me it now looks like this:
```bash
[ERROR] Tests run: 2796, Failures:
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1708863178
Hmm this failure is weird, it only seems to appear if you run the whole
build, building it alone is no problem. I tried changing the name to jaxrs (so
no dashes) and it compiles...
--
rzo1 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317633503
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1708825653
I think the ci does not like the snapshots tag either... maybe I will just
remove it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
rzo1 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317622638
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1708814301
Guess we need to add these users
as written in the JAX-RS TCK docs.
--
This is
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317618150
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317617021
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317614809
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317613424
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317613424
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
rzo1 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317613343
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317612770
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317602778
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317601738
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317600602
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317585330
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
Sollder11 commented on code in PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#discussion_r1317584569
##
tck/jax-rs/pom.xml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
+
43 matches
Mail list logo
