Thanks for the feedback - I've merged that in :)
On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 7:06 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Mark + Markus. Proposal lgtm.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> > Am 17.07.2025 um 14:35 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > Lookin
Hi,
I agree with Mark + Markus. Proposal lgtm.
Gruß
Richard
> Am 17.07.2025 um 14:35 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore
> :
>
> Hi All
>
> Looking at the definition of a ManagedExecutorService, such as below, it
> looks like there isn't a way to force the service to have no queue, and
> always use mo
Hey Jon,
queue=0 meaning queue is disabled sounds more than reasonable to me IMHO.
Doesn't even seem too much like a "magic number" if you asked me. I would
actually almost expect it to work this way.
Thanks
Markus
Am 17. Juli 2025 14:35:34 MESZ schrieb Jonathan Gallimore
:
>Hi All
>
>Look
lgtm!
go for it.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 17.07.2025 um 14:35 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore
> :
>
> Hi All
>
> Looking at the definition of a ManagedExecutorService, such as below, it
> looks like there isn't a way to force the service to have no queue, and
> always use more threads, up to the max t
