Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1802406913
Ok, I ran the tests locally with an apache-cxf build from here
https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/CXF-8671
No changes to the results, the same tests work and fail as before.
--
This
Sollder11 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1802330456
Hey @rzo1 That sounds great, I merged the changes and will look at the 4.1.0
asap. It seems like they did not yet build a version, but I will try to build
it from sources myself.
--
All,
The docker images have been updated to the latest and version 7.x was dropped.
A big thank you to Markus for jumping in and finishing this one up!!!
Thank you,
Rod.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zowalla
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 6:19 AM
To: dev@tomee.apache.org
I will get these images dropped.
Rod.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 8, 2023, at 6:18 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> I am fine with dropping these images ;-)
>
>> Am Mittwoch, dem 08.11.2023 um 08:21 +0100 schrieb Markus Jung:
>> Thinking out loud: should we even keep the 7.x Dockerfiles?
rzo1 commented on PR #1063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063#issuecomment-1801792168
It also looks like the CXF guys have a 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT targeting EE10
(https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1201#issuecomment-1788967288) available, so
perhaps worth a try to upgrade within and
tandraschko commented on PR #1066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1066#issuecomment-1801290914
finally :) thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
I am fine with dropping these images ;-)
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.11.2023 um 08:21 +0100 schrieb Markus Jung:
> Thinking out loud: should we even keep the 7.x Dockerfiles?
> Continuing
> to build those causes these tags to show up here
>
I think, that we should just have stable versions (releases, milestone,
whatever) for these snapshot dependencies. That would be enough for
now, I guess ;-)
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.11.2023 um 11:29 +0100 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> +1 to push a M1 ASAP, without fixing TCK
>
> what shall we do with
Awesome
Thank you Richard for the hard work
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 8:53 AM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just merged the owb4 branch containing the EE10 API updates and
> partly contains work by JL,
+1 to push a M1 ASAP, without fixing TCK
what shall we do with OpenJPA / BatchEE? Not sure about BatchEE but dont
think OpenJPA will implement all new spec features?
Am Mi., 8. Nov. 2023 um 11:14 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Awesome
>
> Thank you Richard for
10 matches
Mail list logo
