Why should it not be allowed?
There are even samples for a PersistenceContext producer field in the CDI spec.
They are not EXTENDED though.
Btw not sure what you want to achieve with it...
That one is pretty easy to explain. By default when working without DTOs but
with plain entities on the
hmm, aren't you used to produce your own em instead of using a container
one? whatever you can use a stateful directly to achieve it but you can't
produce an extended em.
The spec is not that clear about it, it says the extended em is bound to
the stateful. You can still wrap your calls in the
Effectively the producer method is the same like having a method getEm() in my
@Stateful
The EM is imo still bound to the @Stateful but it is _used_ outside of it.
I gonna rewrite the sample to use the Stateful as interceptor. But I fear it
will still not work.
LieGrue,
strub
-
Hi Andy,
we need to provide something (so scope runtime or compile) otherwise no log
will work in tests/standalone at least. Since we log most of our messages
with JUL slf4j-jdk14 seems fine.
What's the issue?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog:
