Re: Vote new committer: Daniel Cunha

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 7:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Not the way it is generally. Main point is suppose we say no...Daniel would > leave the project where the no can also mean " let's see a bit more". > > That said such demand generally has some notable

Re: what is which branch up for?

On Jan 29, 2015, at 10:28 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi Alan! Where do you see that? I keep reading that Atlasssian document and I don’t see where it requires cherry picking each and every commit. You have a master branch and a development branch. All work happens

Re: what is which branch up for?

On Jan 28, 2015, at 11:48 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Alan, the gitflow way is basically review then commit. Because the 'Release Manager' (of whom we lack...) needs to review and choose (cherry-pick) EACH AND EVERY SINGLE COMMIT. Where do you see that? I keep reading

Re: what is which branch up for?

On Jan 28, 2015, at 1:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: well it is by design opposed to apache way since if it is used it is to have the ability to change commit history - if not it is really useless. I’m sure that I’m being dense but how is this form of branch

Re: useless branches and branch deletes at asf git repos

Ahh, ok, your warnings did seem overly broad to me. How is that enforced on ASF infrastructure? Is it by an “honor system” that we assume no history rewrites are taking place? Regards, Alan On Jan 28, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Deleting those is fine. But

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.7.2/OpenEJB 4.7.2 (staging-1045)

openejb-4.7.2 does not build for me [INFO] Using Groovy-Eclipse compiler to compile both Java and Groovy files org.codehaus.groovy.control.messages.SyntaxErrorMessage@22a80e24 /home/acabrera/dev/tomee/examples/groovy-spock/src/test/java/org/superbiz/groovy/HelloSpecification.groovy: 21

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.1/TomEE 1.7.1 (staging-1041)

+1 Regards, Alan On Sep 12, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.7.1/ Maven Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1041 Binaries Source:

What is the LIBRARIES file for?

Just wondering. Regards, Alan

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1039)

On Aug 11, 2014, at 2:36 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alan, what is the exact error? Maybe it can be fixed easily. I once asked the INFRA team whether we could get an OSX builtbot so such issues could be determined ahead of time. I could try to open a JIRA for that if we say

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1039)

I think that I’m suffering from deja vu, realistically dementia; I think that I’ve asked this question before. Do we care if the tagged source cannot build under Mac OS X? Regards, Alan On Aug 10, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi Everyone, What's

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1038)

Why did you have to cancel? On Aug 9, 2014, at 3:31 PM, agumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Had to cancel, will do a detailed vote the next round. Andy. - -- Andy Gumbrecht http://www.tomitribe.com agumbre...@tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1038)

nm, http://www.apache.org/dist/openejb/KEYS. +1 Regards, Alan On Aug 9, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Can spmeone remind me where is our KEYS file? Thanks! Regards, Alan On Aug 9, 2014, at 2:44 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

There seems to be a number of license failures after I run ant -f rat.xml scan On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: -