Re: [PR] [TOMEE-4402] Remove JCache (JSR 107) API and its implementation (tomee)

There are quite a few specs in the javax namespace still. If they are isolated it's imo fine to include them. It's just another 'optional' library. And a very useful indeed! It's imo a matter of time when it will finally get moved over to jakarta. LieGrue,strub On Monday, 16 September 2024

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 16.07.2024 um 10:04 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M2. > > This is the second milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. > > Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen.

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

lgtm +1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 08.04.2024 um 11:33 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.3 > > It contains some version upgrades (cxf, jackson, batchee) and security > backports for the recent Tomcat CVEs. > > Here are the h

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 02.04.2024 um 09:47 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1. > > It is a first milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. > Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen.

Re: [DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

on * ct injection * field injection but no CDI.current().select()... Feel free to reference this when creating a TCK challenge. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 23.02.2024 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Please create a TCK Challenge and disable the test for now. > > txs and LieGr

Re: [DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

Please create a TCK Challenge and disable the test for now. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 22.02.2024 um 20:09 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hi all, > > I want to get consensus on filling a TCK challenge against the Batch > TCK. As written in the other thread, I am currently working on getting >

OSGi information in TomEE 9 and 10

Hi! Seems we do need to update our OSGi import declarations? view-source:https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/openejb-core/9.1.1/openejb-core-9.1.1.pom org.apache.openejb.jee.wls;version="[4.0,5)", org.apache.openejb.loader;version="[4.0,5)", org.apache.openejb.client

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 9.1.0

quick check looks fine +1 (binding) txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 06.06.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hi all, > > this is a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 9.1.0. > > It is a maintenance release with some bug fixes and dependencies > upgrades (MicroProfile 5, ActiveMQ, Johnzon

Re: [VOTE] JakartaEE API 9.1.1

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 16.05.2023 um 21:59 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hi all, > > this is a vote for a maintenance of our JakartaEE 9.1 shade artifact > > This bug fix release only fixes TOMEE-4199: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4199 > > ### > > Maven R

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE Patch Plugin 0.10

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 02.01.2023 um 12:31 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > Hi, > > I'd like to vote Apache TomEE Patch Plugin 0.10 up for vote. The changes > are fairly minimal and consist of patching the source jar so that IDE isn't > lost. This release is required so we can then quickly pus

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 9.0.0

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 03.01.2023 um 10:53 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > Hi all, > > I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been > almost a year since we certified the server using a bytecode enhancement > approach. Even though it worked, it introduced a lot of res

Re: Geronimo future if any

The whole point of Geronimo is nowadays to provide common reusable EE parts for other ASF projects. This is important for many projects which do not depend on TomEE. E.g. all the parts TomEE is actually using. I do agree that those parts are moving a bit slower. But there is a very low boundary

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.11 - take 2

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub > Am 20.04.2022 um 13:26 schrieb Alex The Rocker : > > Hello, > > All tests finished, +1 (non binding) > > Thanks, > Alex > > Le ven. 15 avr. 2022 à 22:26, Jean-Louis Monteiro > a écrit : >> >> My own +1 (binding) >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.co

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.10

+1 hopefully on the right end this time. LieGrue, strub > Am 18.02.2022 um 12:11 schrieb Wiesner, Martin > : > > Hi All, > > +1 > > Conducted my tests as usual with J17 / MacOS. > > Best > Martin > -- > https://twitter.com/mawiesne > > > Am 15.02.2022 um 15:18 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.9

sorry folks, my macbook mail has a serious glitch in it's thread view. want to ship my +1 for the 8.0.10 vote since yesterday and keep failing :( will reply to the correct mail after a reset of my mailbox > Am 18.02.2022 um 15:03 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.9

+1 (binding) txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 23.12.2021 um 13:24 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1188 > > Binaries & Source: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.9

+1 with the new dist. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 23.12.2021 um 13:24 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1188 > > Binaries & S

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 8.0.8

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 01.09.2021 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.8. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1186 > > Binaries & Source: > https://di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 03.05.2021 um 17:01 schrieb David Blevins : > > Ok, folks, > > Here we go. Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE > 9.1 release ballot today. Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8 > and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap. I think we should p

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

+1 LieGrue,strub On Monday, 3 May 2021, 11:30:50 CEST, Alex The Rocker wrote: +1 (non-binding) for this 8.0.7 release, I'll test it as soon as link to binaries is available ! Alex Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 10:24, David Blevins a écrit : > > Dear Community. > > The time has come :)

Re: [DISCUSS] Retiring the "tomee" webapps from TomEE 8

yup, the webapp was always kind of a a half baked solution imo. When you just need CDI, then one can use OWB natively in the app on an unmodified Tomcat. If one needs the fully blown EE features, then TomEE is a perfect fit and well tested. I think the complexity added with the web app dropin is

Re: some TomEE 8 work towards Java16 support

ache/tomee/pull/693 Just in case it helps a bit. Best regards, Vicente. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:07 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > hi there! > > I'm right now in the middle of some refactoring to update TomEE8 to the > latest OWB version. > I also did need to tweak some internals to

some TomEE 8 work towards Java16 support

hi there! I'm right now in the middle of some refactoring to update TomEE8 to the latest OWB version. I also did need to tweak some internals to better deal with eventing for EARs. It's mostly corner cases like making sure that things like ProcessInjectionPoint triggered by InjectionFactory#crea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.6

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 14.01.2021 um 17:05 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.6. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1179 > > Binaries & Source: > https://

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

Hi! The CDI api glitch is in AnnotationLiteral#hashCode. A nasty copy&paste error which Arne Limburg from the OWB team discovered and fixed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6784 LieGrue, strub > Am 10.11.2020 um 15:04 schr

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2618> ? > > Alex > > Le lun. 19 oct. 2020 à 22:30, Mark Struberg > mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> a écrit : >> >> Hi ladies! >> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5. >> >> This mos

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

hi! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1: Jean-Louis, Jon, Daniel Cunha, Cesar, DavidB, Daniel Dos Santos, Richard, Mark No -1 nor 0. I'll go on with the release tasks and also update TomEE8. LieGrue, strub > Am 19.10.2020 um 22:30 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi ladies!

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

e should > experience that from time to time :) > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> On Oct 19, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Hi ladies! >> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on Apach

[VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

Hi ladies! I'd like to call a VOTE on Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5. This mostly contains updates to newer bugfix releases of some spec jars. Including an important hasCode glitch in the CDI-2.0 API. The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1176/

Re: [DISCUSS] release javaee-api-8.0.5?

Hmm, we do not have any jakarta dependencies at all, why did we add the EPL license? This should get removed. LieGrue, strub > Am 18.10.2020 um 23:12 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi! > > I've update the javaee-api to the latest releases from geronimo. > The most

[DISCUSS] release javaee-api-8.0.5?

hi! I've update the javaee-api to the latest releases from geronimo. The most important fix is for a hashcode flaw in cdi-2.0. If nobody objects, then I'll roll a release tomorrow. It is committed and I also did deploy it to the ASF public snapshots repository. txs and LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.9

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 05.08.2020 um 22:49 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 7.0.9 > > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1175/ > > Binaries & Source: > https://dist.apache.org/rep

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.1.4

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 05.08.2020 um 22:43 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 7.1.4 > > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1174/ > > Binaries & Source: > https://dist.apache.org/rep

Re: [VOTE] Missing artifact - TomEE 8.0.4

+1 LieGrue strub > Am 11.08.2020 um 10:58 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > We're missing an artifact on our download page for TomEE 8.0.4 Webprofile > (thanks Richard Zowalla for pointing this out). > > This is already in Maven: > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

+1 binding LieGrue and thanks Jon! strub > Am 22.07.2020 um 16:34 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE > 8.0.4. > > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/ >

Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)

cool, thanks. Much easier as having to build the TCK suit oneself ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 16.06.2020 um 01:34 schrieb David Blevins : > > Got some information from Ed Bratt over Jakarta EE slack. > > I've not dug into any of this, but wanted to pass it along immediately as the > situation is f

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 14.05.2020 um 15:27 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a third attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.0.8

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.05.2020 um 16:23 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at releasing of TomEE 7.0.8. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.1.3

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.05.2020 um 16:15 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at releasing of TomEE 7.1.3. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach

Re: [VOTE] Move javaee-api to Git.

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub > Am 29.04.2020 um 23:39 schrieb Cesar Hernandez : > > Hi, > > As a follow up from the `Javax -> Jakarta rename` thread [1] > I would like to propose moving the existing SVN javaee-api repo [2] to > Git[3] to enable wider visibility and collaboration either via GitH

Re: javax -> jakarta

tml/rffa51b77d13a6ab6423ed6cdf531a1483848b6965fe0c67b2263ff48@%3Cdev.geronimo.apache.org%3E> LieGrue, strub > Am 22.04.2020 um 07:30 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi Cesar! > > EPLv2 is basically LGPL but allows sub-licensing. > > https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.tokw8l7u084o > <https://www.

Re: javax -> jakarta

'm didn't notice the licensing aspect you mention on b). > What would be the work need it, for example in java-ee-api, to add the > reciprocity you are mentioning? > Just a license header change? > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 3:34, Mark Struberg ( <mailto:stru

javax -> jakarta

Hi folks! While moving over to jakartaee we need to discuss which specs we want to include in our maven builds. We have a jakarta.* branch for the geronimo specs since a year. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/jakarta/

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 7.0-2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 26.03.2020 um 20:50 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > +1 > > Le jeu. 26 mars 2020 à 17:58, David Blevins a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> >> -- >> David Blevins >> http://twitter.com/dblevins >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >>> On Feb 25, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimo

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

whoops, missed my +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.03.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Yes, you folks are right, we can still ship another updated version after > that. > Let's get this out to the streets! > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > >

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

Yes, you folks are right, we can still ship another updated version after that. Let's get this out to the streets! +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.03.2020 um 14:55 schrieb Zowalla, Richard > : > > +1

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

cool, thanks! LieGrue, strub > Am 13.03.2020 um 19:12 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > That search is a neat trick. I'd suggest we remove that dependency, build, > and see how the JMS TCK tests look. > > Jon > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 5:28 PM Mark Struberg

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

son> and yeah, it potentially creates problems due to json-p clashes. LieGrue, strub > Am 13.03.2020 um 17:58 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi and thanks, Richard! > > I think we should get rid of it. And it also shows one of the challenges of > the TomEE project: we consu

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

SON-P implementations should like a bad idea... >> >> Kind regards, >> Alexandre >> >> Le ven. 13 mars 2020 à 12:29, Mark Struberg >> a écrit : >>> >>> Btw, why do we ship jackson anyway? >>> We used to have Johnzon only. Jac

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

hade plugin > has various transformers which can be configured to do what you want. Happy > to help out with it. > > Jon > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:51 AM Mark Struberg > wrote: > >> wait Jon, right now preparing geronimo spec versions with module names. >> &

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

Btw, why do we ship jackson anyway? We used to have Johnzon only. Jackson is imo not required. What was the reason we re-introduced it? LieGrue, strub > Am 11.03.2020 um 11:26 schrieb dkwakkel : > > > FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10.2 lacks certain > xbean-reflect/JNDI blocking

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

wait Jon, right now preparing geronimo spec versions with module names. Automatic-Module-Name: javax.persistence Btw, how to handle a single jar which is a shade of MULTIPLE maven modules? LieGrue, strub > Am 25.02.2020 um 21:09 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi > > This is a vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.1.2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 08.01.2020 um 11:23 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a second attempt at roll of a TomEE 7.1.2. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachet

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.0.7

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 14.01.2020 um 17:13 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > This is my +1. Please note this is for 7.0.7 (not 7.1.2) as stated in the > first line of the email. > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:27 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 08.01.2020 um 11:18 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a second attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.1. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheto

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomee 7.1.2

+1 tested with a few big apps. LieGrue, strub > Am 19.12.2019 um 08:26 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 7.1.2. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/con

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.12.2019 um 08:19 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.1. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheto

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 7.0.7

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 19.12.2019 um 16:54 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 7.0.7. Please can you take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheto

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-3

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 09.12.2019 um 23:09 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi > > This is a vote for an updated Java EE spec jar, with one single change over > javaee-api:8.0-2: > > TOMEE-2690 make sure to not exclude default ProviderLocator and Activator. > > This is a pre-requisite for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 (take 3)

post +1 And thanks for rolling the release! LieGrue, strub > Am 15.09.2019 um 19:21 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos > : > > +1 > -- > > *Daniel Dias dos Santos* > Java Developer > SouJava & JCP Member > GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava > T

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

Yes, that's a sane approach. EPL just requires us to have it mentioned in every downstream NOTICE iiuc. From the EPL v2 [1] 3.1 If a Contributor Distributes the Program in any form, then: • a) the Program must also be made available as Source Code, in accordance with section 3.2, and

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

s://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 15:04, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> No, this is an intended situation. >> When one fully passes the TCK then you get the EFSL. This 'removes' the >> copy

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

ady agreed to not redo the API and use microprofile jars. > > > > It's the same license and we are using them in our MicroProfile > > implementations. > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

depends what their license is. EPL is (weak) copyleft. Thus I would like to avoid exposing it downstream as api. LieGrue, strub > Am 03.09.2019 um 16:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > If we still can't reuse jakata artifacts (their license is ok and there is > no impl reference inside so we

Re: TOMEE-2618 Reconcile javax.activation dependencies

I'd rather roll a Geronimo-activation-1.2 spec. EPL is a weak copyleft license. That means shipping with an EPL dependency has a legal impact on downstream consumers. That's the reason why it is only CatB. Rolling the few missing enhancements should really be easy. LieGrue, strub > Am 13.08.201

Re: Upgrade BVal to official (not patched) one

I can probably help with that a bit. Just ping me if you need something. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.08.2019 um 20:16 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > I would like to release 2.0.3, as it contains some fixes and performance > boosts, if you are ok with using the official bval > > Jean-Louis Monte

Re: tomee-patch release staging?

laced it, so things are all fine. Mental note to use the > same staging repo should we need to do that again -- which we hopefully won't > any time soon. > > > -David > > >> On Aug 4, 2019, at 11:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Done. >&g

Re: tomee-patch release staging?

Done. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.08.2019 um 08:28 schrieb David Blevins : > > Go ahead and drop it. Thank you! > > Good catch. > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> On Aug 4, 2019, at 11:15 PM, Ma

Re: JIRA cleanup

I've now at least moved the open ones from M3 to M4. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.08.2019 um 08:16 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > another thing I noticed. > > > 8.0.0-M3 got released, but the JIRA version still has many open tickets on > this version. > I suggest to m

JIRA cleanup

another thing I noticed. 8.0.0-M3 got released, but the JIRA version still has many open tickets on this version. I suggest to move all those to 8.0.0-M4 and close all resolved tickets and mark M3 as released. Who want's to do it? LieGrue, strub

tomee-patch release staging?

Good morning! While releasing Johnzon-1.1.13 I stumbled across a TomEE staging repo from May https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1134 Can we drop this, or is it still needed? LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 8.0.0-M3 (staging-1136) - take two

whoops, replied to wrong vote. +1 LieGrue, strub Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2019, 01:43 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Ok, the extra libraries have been removed and new M3 build created. Vote will > be open for 72 hours or as needed. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 8.0.0-M3 (staging-1135)

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub Am Freitag, den 17.05.2019, 16:05 +0900 schrieb David Blevins: > Ok, finally vote time! > > Maven Repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1135/ > > Binaries & Source: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-11

Re: Jakarta EE namespace discussion

And here is some more in-depth technical information https://struberg.wordpress.com/2019/05/06/the-way-forward-for-jakartaee-packages/ Already trying out how well Option C (big-bang, Davids 1) would work and what borders we'd hit. Copying over what I wrote on the tomcat list: --- I've also alrea

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] release Apache TomEE javaee-api 8.0-1

Good morning! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1 Mark, Alex Rabelo, Jean-Louis, Ivan, Daniel, Richard, Jon, Cesar No -1 nor 0 txs to all who reviewed and voted! I'll go on with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 10.04.2019 um 22:41 schrieb Mark Struberg : > >

Re: [VOTE] release Apache TomEE javaee-api 8.0-1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 10.04.2019 um 22:41 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > We've fixed the following 2 (important) tickets: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2490 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2508 > > The JPA-2.2 update is

[VOTE] release Apache TomEE javaee-api 8.0-1

Hi! We've fixed the following 2 (important) tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2490 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2508 The JPA-2.2 update is required for updating to OpenJPA-3.1.0. The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetom

[DISCUSS] will release javaee-api-8.0-1

Hi! Gonna do a release for the javaee-api 8. There are 2 important tickets which have been fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2490 dead-lock in JSON-P api https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2508 update to JPA-2.2 Please shout if I should wait a bit. LieGrue, strub

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-3.1.0

FYI. OpenJPA-3.1.0 vote is otw. LieGrue, strub > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: Mark Struberg > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-3.1.0 > Datum: 6. April 2019 um 14:52:00 MESZ > An: openjpa-dev > Antwort an: d...@openjpa.apache.org > > hi fol

Re: [DISCUSS] version of our next javaee-api

urity_1.0_spec> Thanks! Cheers, Roberto > On 9 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Mark Struberg wrote: > > I've only upgraded the various versions of our dependencies so far.I did not > add anything new. Not sure if we have that already. > >    On Friday, 8 March 2019, 11:46:37

Re: [DISCUSS] version of our next javaee-api

I've only upgraded the various versions of our dependencies so far.I did not add anything new. Not sure if we have that already. On Friday, 8 March 2019, 11:46:37 CET, Roberto Cortez wrote: +1 Does this include the security api as well? > On 8 Mar 2019, at 06:41, Mark

Re: [DISCUSS] version of our next javaee-api

David is right, next will be 8.0-1 8.0 is for JavaEE8, -1 is the first update. LieGrue, Strub > Am 07.03.2019 um 21:37 schrieb exabrial12 : > > I'd stick to https://semver.org/ whenever possible :) This also helps Nexus > and Maven make correct decisions. > > 8.0.1 would be a bugfix, 8.1.0 wou

[DISCUSS] version of our next javaee-api

Hi folks! I've fixed some nasty bugs in our javaee-api (mostly updated to important geronimo-spec bug fixes) and would love to release it soon.The currently released version has a number javaee-api-8.0.Right now the version in the pom is 8.0.1-SNAPSHOT.So when rolling a release should we go to 8

Re: JakartaEE TCK

I went through this yesterday night. Over here it was mainly missing spec jars. The TCK also compiles against tons of internal Glassfish classes, proprietary databasess I've never heard of, etc. I eventually gave up yesterday :) Can you probably share some of the compile errors you got? LieGrue

Re: Jakarta EE TCK

+1 and thanks! Also am interested to run the JPA related tests over at OpenJPA. LieGrue, strub > Am 15.01.2019 um 00:34 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Thanks, I'll update that and I have couple of changes to commit as well. > > Jon > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 23:23 David Blevins >>> On J

JakartaEE TCK

Hi folks! The EE8 TCKs are now open source. https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck But was anyone able to build this? Or does anybody know if there is already a published zip like we had with the closed TCKs? txs and LieGrue, strub

Re: Move to Gitbox?

+1, at minimum the ee-api project should also be moved to gitbox. LieGrue, strub > Am 28.12.2018 um 22:59 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro : > > +1 > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:12 PM Roberto Cortez > wrote

Re: Is TomEE ready to ship for Santa? - Conducting pre-xmas releases: 7.0.6, 7.1.1, 8.0.0-M2

+1, just ping me if you need some help. LieGrue, strub > Am 13.12.2018 um 17:57 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > There's some stuff I need to finish backporting, but I'm generally in > favour. We have a Johnzon vote in progress, and could do with an OWB > release for the 7.0.x and 7.1.x branc

Re: Java 11 status

enjpa is not bound to a pool - except in > tests - and tomee default pool is not dbcp2 but tomcat-jdbc. So it is not a > requirement but more a nice to have IMHO. Also not a regression since last > release so not a blocker ;). > > > Le sam. 10 nov. 2018 21:02, Mark Struberg a >

Re: Java 11 status

We also need to wait for commons-pool and commons-dbcp. I fixed a deadlock in the pool.Only after that I'll be able to release OpenJPA. LieGrue,strub On Friday, 9 November 2018, 21:02:13 CET, Mark Struberg wrote: Right now I do a lot of OpenJPA hacking. One of the tasks is to

Re: Java 11 status

Right now I do a lot of OpenJPA hacking. One of the tasks is to also support xbean-asm7. That should go into openjpa-3.0.1. What is the timeframe we want to target? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.11.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > I don't have the list handy but tomee will need at least

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

he vote and promote the staging repo? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:30 AM Mark Struberg >>> w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

+1 looks good enough for a first release ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 17.10.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > On travel, will review tonight. > > Sent with autocorrect... > >> On 17.10.2018, at 16:05, Richard Monson-Haefel >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 1

On travel, will review tonight. Sent with autocorrect... > On 17.10.2018, at 16:05, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:29 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Many thanks for working on the release Roberto! >> >> Jon >>

Re: TomEE8 / Upgrade MyFaces

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 09.10.2018 um 09:42 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > : > > Hi, > > i read on the BVal mailing list, that you would like to release TomEE8 soon. > Could someone update MyFaces to the latest release? ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2236) > It's quite important a

Re: How to release snapshot dependencies in a TomEE release (Re: TomEE 8 Release Notes Preview)

The primary way should imo ALWAYS to help the other projects we rely on to get the releases out. Falling back on a tomee internal release is only a last effort if the other projects are not responsible. LieGrue, strub > Am 28.09.2018 um 23:50 schrieb David Blevins : > >> On Sep 28, 2018, at 3

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome Roberto Cortez as new Apache TomEE committer

Good morning ladies and gents! It's a great pleasure to announce that Roberto Cortez has accepted our invitation to become an Apache TomEE committer! Welcome Roberto! your Apache TomEE PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0 (take 2)

checked with an app. sigs fine, source zip hash oh, rat ok. +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 03.09.2018 um 23:22 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi Everyone, > > Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look and > vote? Everyone, > committer or not, is encouraged to test and vot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0

t;>>> >>>> JSON processing in this software was derived from the JSON.simple >>> toolkit. >>>> https://code.google.com/p/json-simple/ >>>> - >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Other than that I can&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 30.08.2018 um 12:24 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Hi Everyone, > > Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look and > vote? Everyone, > committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content

  1   2   3   4   5   >