Re: Let's do better

All, I followed what David calls "incidents" or "childish" quite closely in the past. Why? Cause such situations are quite familiar to me. I've been there thousands of times and what I can tell for granted is that non of these situations are neither "incidents" nor "childish". As a matter of

Re: Issue in starting TomEE as window Service

Hi Dignesh, yeah I mean the event viewer facility. The location where native logs and audit logs usually end up under windoze. Sorry didn't want to boot into a VM to get the exact name. And yes I was referring to the batch file where you can increase the log level. What you could as well try to

Re: Issue in starting TomEE as window Service

Did you investigate the windoze service logs? I think the service executable that runs TomEE as well writes native logs. You could as well try to increase the logging level for the service executable. Cheers Daniel On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Dignesh wrote: > Yes, >

Re: Compilation Errors in JDK 1.8 under Mac OSX

On OSX Eclipse does use whatever JDK it finds on the system. Of course that can be configured accordingly in Eclipse. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Alex Gout wrote: > The eclipse is using an older compiler. Looking at the message, a compiler > older than 1.7.

Re: Eclipse Servers Integration

I suppose we have to submit a patch if we want to get that added, no? Cheers Daniel On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yeah, iirc we asked eclipse to add it but no news. Intellij idea and netbeans did it Le 6 déc. 2014 16:16, radutoader

Tomitribe joining the CeBIT Open Source Forum 2015?

Hi, thought it might be an interesting thing if the Tomitribe crew would be joining the CeBIT Open Source Forum 2015. - http://www.linux-magazin.de/Special/Cebit-2015/CeBIT-Open-Source-Forum-2015-Call-For-Papers Probably wouldn't be the same audience you regularly meet on other fairs. Cheers

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.1/TomEE 1.7.1 (staging-1041)

+1 Cheers Daniel On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.7.1/ Maven Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1041 Binaries Source:

Re: buildbot: no more space

No only on Windoze. I wasn't sure whether the reported out of space issue occurs on a Windoze or Linux. Cheers Daniel On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: On linux too? Le 15 août 2014 20:43, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com a écrit : Maybe

Re: buildbot: no more space

Maybe this is related to the deep path structure issue where files can't be deleted any more. Cheers Daniel On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: I'll let them know. Andy. On 15/08/2014 14:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys just saw on

Re: [SONARQUBE] TomEE ?

Hi, a couple of days ago we actually filed two JIRA tickets for TomEE trunk and TomEE 1.7.x to be added to Sonar. AFAIK trunk didn't compile but I would expect the 1.7.x branch to be available soon. If not we need to bug the infra folks again either on freenode or by opening a JIRA or comment on

Re: [funny build] build times...

Hi Helio, what is this for? Could you add a bit more context information? If you were experimenting with buildbot enhancement maybe the best place to have them persisted for later usage would be appending your scripts et. al to a JIRA ticket. Or if it's rather meant to be a tutorial/howto adding

Re: [rpm package] with scala help

Hi Helio, I think Thiago Veronezi spent a good amount of his valuable time to get a DEB out of the doors that actually is Debian policy compliant. If you like give him a ping on the DEV list to coordinate your packaging efforts. Maybe some of the insights Thiago gained while working on the DEB

Re: [tomee-dev] abrt fedora

Hi Helio, you mean log information such as sysout and syserr will be written to logs specific to the Automatic Bug-Reporting Tool [1]? If so could you try to investigate how such information could be re-routed to proper logs under /var/log ? I think one purpose of a proper package for a

Re: Support OSGi bundleresource:/ protocol in TomEE

Hi Kasun, thanks for providing this patch, appreciated! I am pondering a bit around the fact that it seems the patch would only work if running inside an Equinox environment. Is my understanding correct that the patch actually isn't OSGi runtime agnostic but only works together with Eclipse

Re: Support OSGi bundleresource:/ protocol in TomEE

Maybe then coordinate with the Karaf folks, if the patch addresses a valid issue it might have been fixed in the Karaf context already. For the records: It looks like the OSGi runtime env sets a particular property [1] which could be accessed at runtime to determine the underlying implementation.

Building TomEE on bb-osx-slave

Hi, based on Alan's trigger on the current voting thread I skimmed through my past JIRA tickets and found INFRA-4339. Is that builtbot still running or did it only build OpenEJB in the past and now kinda became dormant? - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4339 Do we want it

Re: Support OSGi bundleresource:/ protocol in TomEE

12:02, Kasun Gajasinghe kasu...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Daniel, Please see my comments in-line. On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:47 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kasun, thanks for providing this patch, appreciated! I am pondering a bit around the fact that it seems

Re: [tomee-dev] abrt fedora

on source code directories causing unmanaged files on git and/or svn. thanks On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:53 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Helio, you mean log information such as sysout and syserr will be written to logs specific to the Automatic Bug-Reporting Tool [1

Re: [rpm package] with scala help

Don't want to be a crank but if we want a real RPM package I'd rather chack what the alien tool chain creates. It's probably sufficient for the normal user but if we want to have an RPM that complies to certain distribution policies some hand polishing or even writing a package from scratch might

Re: Support OSGi bundleresource:/ protocol in TomEE

/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-13 13:32 GMT+02:00 dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com: An SPI solution was something I thought of in the first place but then my intention while providing feedback was to provide some pointers how the existing patch could be enhanced

Re: [rpm package] with scala help

is OS, so it's a good starting block. Andy. On 13/08/2014 17:27, dsh wrote: Don't want to be a crank but if we want a real RPM package I'd rather chack what the alien tool chain creates. It's probably sufficient for the normal user but if we want to have an RPM that complies to certain

Re: TomEE Site

PluME sounds like a name that stands for its own where the ME in TomEE+ ME reminds me of Java Micro Edition. So I suppose I'd prefer TomEE PluME :) Cheers Daniel On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Thanks for your input. The maven site goal

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1039)

+1 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi Everyone, What's changed: Using Apache Tomcat 7.0.55 - TCK and Buildbot pass. Removed Mozilla Public License for Javassist. Fixed tomee-webapp phase so that webjar is included. Fixed

Re: TomEE Site

Hi, TomEE Plume reads TomEE+ ME on the comparison page. Is that intended? Cheers Daniel On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi All, Could you please review the staging site and let me know if you find any issues.

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1036)

+1 Cheers Daniel On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi everyone. Here it is, the first official vote on Apache TomEE 1.7.0 feature release. Well done to you all for getting us this far. You all deserve a huge pat on the back - Go ahead and give

Re: OpenEJB on analysis.apache.org

Just for the records, Sonar does not only show breaks but as well indicate hot spots for potential problems, provides indication about technical debt and about our code coverage. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Shame? Great I'd

Re: OpenEJB on analysis.apache.org

Btw, I saw projects that had multiple branches on analysis.apache.org, so this may be a newly applied rule due to resource constraints. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, agumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Not shame that they 'do' take trunk, shame they 'only' take trunk.

OpenEJB on analysis.apache.org

Hi, in analysis.apache.org a project OpenEJB is present where TomEE is missing. Do we want both OpenEJB and TomEE results to be published? If so I'd say we need to open a JIRA for adding TomEE to that dashboard too. What do you think? Cheers Daniel

Re: OpenEJB on analysis.apache.org

, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: I think TomEE is king now, so sure we need to get it added asap. We'd need both TomEE branch 1.7.x and TomEE trunk. Do you want to take the lead on that Daniel? Andy. On 28/07/2014 15:43, dsh wrote: Hi, in analysis.apache.org a project

Re: OpenEJB on analysis.apache.org

, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com wrote: The Daniel. Le 28 juil. 2014 16:24, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Andy, yep sure. Let me create an appropriate JIRA this evening when I return back home. I'll as well try to figure out whether the Sonar

Re: [VOTE] org.apache.openejb:javaee-api:6.0-6

+1 Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi TomEE developers, This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and dev@tomee.apache.org. If you are still using d...@openejb.apache.org please update your subscription. Also,

Re: [VOTE] org.apache.openejb.patch:openjpa-parent:2.4.0-nonfinal-1598334

+1 Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi TomEE developers, This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and dev@tomee.apache.org. If you are still using d...@openejb.apache.org please update your subscription. Also,

Re: [VOTE] org.apache.openejb.shade:quartz-openejb-shade:2.2.1

+1 Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com wrote: Hi TomEE developers, This mail is going out to both d...@openejb.apache.org and dev@tomee.apache.org. If you are still using d...@openejb.apache.org please update your subscription. Also,

Re: Code coverage

Sonar that we already leverage does code coverage too. The implementation type can be configured. I.e. Sonar supports multiple code coverage tools provider. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org wrote: Hi guys, Good idea... tkx! I will do that.

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.6.0.2/OpenEJB 4.6.0.2 (staging-1016)

I just voted on the vote thread in case you need another +1. Cheers Daniel On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: seems one binding vote is missing no? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn:

Re: [adventure path] Contributing

Hi, to be quiet precise, TomEE committers are probably using the open source licensing option [1] for IntelliJ. Eclipse works equally well I'd say. It's rather a matter of taste whether one prefers IntelliJ over Eclipse or vice versa. From a technical perspective there shouldn't be any limitation

Re: OpenSSL Version and HeartBleed

Another perspective on this matter: “Returning to Heartbleed, one thing conspicuously missing from the downshouting against OpenSSL is any pointer to a closed-source implementation that is known to have a lower defect rate over time. This is for the very good reason that no such

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0.1/OpenEJB 4.6.0.1 (staging-1015) Round 4

+1 Cheers Daniel On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.comwrote: [generated email] SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0.1/ Maven Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1015 Binaries

Re: OpenSSL Version and HeartBleed

and accurate answer. 2014-04-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com: Hi, I'd suppose that the OpenSSL version used by APR depends on the OpenSSL version provided by the underlying OS too. Additionally that yet doesn't say anything about the hearbleed vulnerability cause OpenSSL could

Re: OpenSSL Version and HeartBleed

Hi, I'd suppose that the OpenSSL version used by APR depends on the OpenSSL version provided by the underlying OS too. Additionally that yet doesn't say anything about the hearbleed vulnerability cause OpenSSL could have been deactivated by the corresponding compile flag (-DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS

Re: Debian Package

, but I have a feeling that they include their own debian repositories references in the localhost. That would add another issue: where to put our binaries? I dont think the ASF has is own debian repository. []s, Thiago. On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:26 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: Debian Package

Hi, can you describe a little more what's the issue with the changelog file? Is it just that you don't know how to create it or rather that you don't know how to create it automatically while building the DEB package? I think adding that information helps others to provide some support on this

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

+1 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/

Re: Could anyone tell the new links?

Btw, these are namespace URIs and not URLs because they only must identify but AFAIK they don't need to locate a resource. Otherwise I'd suppose these resource would really need to exist. Cheers Daniel On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:26 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I thought these

Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.

This should get you started: 1. In the Administration Console select *Servers* 2. Expand *Server Type* and select* WebSphere application servers * 3. Click on the name of your server 4. Expand *Java and Process Management* and select* Process Definition.* 5. Under the *Additional

Re: Refcard?

Cool, could you do a PDF easily too? Cheers Daniel On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Try to write a kind of refcard for tomee: http://tomee.apache.org/refcard/refcard.html Wdyt? I put the project used for the generation in

Re: Refcard?

What does theme it mean? Providing an XSL-FO stylesheet? Cheers Daniel On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: If you theme it yes or just screenshot it Le 14 juin 2013 19:12, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com a écrit : Cool, could you do a PDF easily

Re: Refcard?

Docbook would be cool. I could then do the XSL-FO. Cheers Daniel On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Theme = yes, i can generate docbook easily The current card works for openejb standalone too normally Le 14 juin 2013 19:29, David Salter

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Hi David, what's needed that someone else could stand in for you while you are unavailable? I suppose your are some kind of a bottleneck if it gets to sorting all these things out... Cheers Daniel On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Hello from the

Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.

Maybe this is related to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1126 I.e. it's a CXF issue in the first place. Cheers Daniel On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Hi What's the issue? Le 4 avr. 2013 00:25, ehenson ehen...@gartman.com a

Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.

Eric, we need a full stacktrace, logs etc. to analyze the issue any further. The IBM JDK packages Apache Xerces/Xalan and thus by nature there won't be any com.sun.* packages provided. We had similar issues in the past where support for non com.sun.* packages (e.g. if not running inside a

Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.

That's the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6109 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:29 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: @Romain: I'll try to raise an INFRA JIRA this evening. I don't think that I do have access to the build server any more and AFAIK there's only an IBM JDK v6

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Btw, there was just an announcement about a new code signing service. On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:18 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Vote passes with 8 +1s and 1 +0. +1s: Alan Cabrera Daniel Haischt David Blevins Jean-Louis Monteiro Jeff Genender Thiago Veronezi Jacek

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Could be good could be bad. Read this ;) Gmail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmail was made available to the public by Google http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google on 1 April 2004, after extensive rumors of its existence during testing. Owing to the April Fool's Day

Re: 1.6.0

on a Raspberry PI. I have gotten it pretty close to complete, but several chunks of tests timeout as that platform is a little slow. -David On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:59 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote: I suppose Raspberry Pi support relates to getting TomEE to work on the Oracle Java SE

Re: 1.6.0

Did you figure out what exactly is slow? Disk IO (USB or onboard storage)? The CPU itself and if yes did you try overclocking (might require passive cooling)? On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:57 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Model B. -David On Mar 26, 2013, at 2:15 PM, dsh

Re: 1.6.0

I suppose Raspberry Pi support relates to getting TomEE to work on the Oracle Java SE embedded for ARM platforms [1]? If so I am interested, but would like to see the task to be extended to ARM platform support for TomEE including the Raspberry Pi. Frankly, I am not a big fan of all the hype

Re: IGood validation candidates: SubTask 39, 48

Hi Ralf, thought I am going to answer this question, knowing that you probably meant David instead of Daniel ;) I'd say if you like take both if they are available. That's really up to your personal working style and how you like to sort out things. Don't forget to ask questions as soon as they