Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-20 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
So much feedback. That's awesome. vote is going to close. David is currently sleeping, but he should do that after i guess. JLouis 2013/11/20 Bjorn Danielsson > +1 > > Switched from EclipseLink to OpenJPA in my app and did a quick test. > Fixed a bug in my own code as a result :-) Everything o

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-20 Thread Bjorn Danielsson
+1 Switched from EclipseLink to OpenJPA in my app and did a quick test. Fixed a bug in my own code as a result :-) Everything ok after that. -- Bjorn Danielsson Cuspy Code AB David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:54 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, my +1 > > -David > > On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Ok, TCK clean so far. >> >> Maven Repo: >> >> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ >> >> Binaries: >> >> - http

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread David Blevins
Ok, my +1 -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > -

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
+1 Jon On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - https://svn

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread dsh
+1 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - h

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 -dain

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-19 Thread Alex The Rocker
+1, if it helps. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: > We were simply missing a lot of excludes in the rat.xml, which I've added > in trunk with some small comments. > > There were 5 trivial java files missing headers. No IP in any of them. > Fixed in trunk anyway, but not wo

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
We were simply missing a lot of excludes in the rat.xml, which I've added in trunk with some small comments. There were 5 trivial java files missing headers. No IP in any of them. Fixed in trunk anyway, but not worth the 18+ community hours to reroll and review new binaries. -David On Nov

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
Digging in. A gentle note to late feedback like this; we're 2 weeks and several all-nighters into this release :) This is a very big part of our long release cycles. The feedback is excellent, the timing could be improved :) -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 7:35 PM, "Alan D. Cabrera" wrote: > Th

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
There seems to be a number of license failures after I run ant -f rat.xml scan On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff David Blevins November 17, 2013 at 3:16 AM Ok, TCK clean so far.Maven Repo:- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/Binaries:- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/Tag:- https://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 Le 17 nov. 2013 16:15, "Thiago Veronezi" a écrit : > +1 > > []s, > Thiago. > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >wrote: > > > that repo worked fine for my tests as well > > > > +1 > > > > -M > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > jeano...@g

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Thiago Veronezi
+1 []s, Thiago. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > that repo worked fine for my tests as well > > +1 > > -M > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >wrote: > > > Thanks David, here is my +1 > > > > JLouis > > > > > > 2013/11/17 David Blevins > >

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
that repo worked fine for my tests as well +1 -M On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Thanks David, here is my +1 > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/17 David Blevins > > > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/or

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Thanks David, here is my +1 JLouis 2013/11/17 David Blevins > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - https://svn.

[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

2013-11-17 Thread David Blevins
Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ Tag: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ The vote will go for 72 hours.