Re: Quartz, next

I see what you mean now - As shade only works at the 'package' phase there is no way round this other than to use your approach - An external project dependency. Dammit Andy -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p4666717.html Sent from

Re: Quartz, next

You need to enable the 'main' profile in the maven projects view, then the whole world comes in to say hello (takes a while even on a fast machine). Also enable automatic imports in the intellij maven settings. Andy. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz

Re: Quartz, next

So how would we feel with 'openejb-shade-[quartz]' ? And eventually bring all shade jars in line with that naming? I'm happy to do the maven stuff either way. Andy -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p486.html Sent from the OpenEJB

Re: Quartz, next

I agree. Just checked in for a build something that works for me - We can rename stuff later. Andy. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p488.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Quartz, next

that works for me - We can rename stuff later. Andy. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p488.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Quartz, next

On Dec 10, 2013, at 2:40 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: As far as where the shaded project lives, I'm cool with whatever as long as it doesn't: - break Intellij so we can still compile with a plain Intellij import and not having to go through any magic to compile/run

Re: Quartz, next

at build time when we deploy to either a snapshot or release repo. Moving it out of the project completely is IMHO not the way to go as it complicates the build/deploy and release even more. Andy. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next

Re: Quartz, next

/rmannibucau 2013/12/10 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com: And renaming to openejb-quartz-shade would make sense i.e. produce openejb-quartz-shade-4.6.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p451.html Sent from the OpenEJB

Re: Quartz, next

(i.e. All openejb jars together) -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p456.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Quartz, next

listing (i.e. All openejb jars together) -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p456.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Quartz, next

david.blev...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013, 2:38 Subject: Re: Quartz, next Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting. There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and test the heck out of it. -David On Dec 3

Re: Quartz, next

: Quartz, next Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting. There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and test the heck out of it. -David On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade

Re: Quartz, next

But, the main objective of shading is to let users embed their own Quartz if I understood without interfering with TomEE internals. So if they embed it, where is the issue? They gonna be able to extend/implement whatever they want to. JLouis 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

Re: Quartz, next

But no more the tomee one without copying code. (once again not blocking) Le 4 déc. 2013 09:35, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit : But, the main objective of shading is to let users embed their own Quartz if I understood without interfering with TomEE internals. So if they embed

Re: Quartz, next

Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting. There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and test the heck out of it. -David On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in

Re: Quartz, next

Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in org.apache.openejb.quartz Le 2 déc. 2013 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi How do we handle quartz for next releases? It is very often a pain I propose: 1) if in openejb loader use this one 2) if not look for it in