Jan Holesovsky schrieb:
> Oh, sure! My original mail contains my suggestion of what belongs where -
> please have a look, input is most appreciated. I did few corrections
> afterwards (accessibility, bean, crashrep, and package moved to
> ooo-apps-extensions, jut moved to ure, rvpapi removed,
Volker Quetschke schrieb:
> As I wrote in my earlier response, no, the support effort in *not*
> significant. That is not the reason to drop the support, but testing
> (RE and QA) suffer when different build environments/tools are used.
Isn't that a significant effort? :-)
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mat
Martin Hollmichel schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> just stumbled about that the report design extension is built during the
> regular build process, wouldn't it be better at all to create a source
> tarball include jfreereport and reportdesign modules. Where we already
> achieved modularization in the sourc
Rüdiger Timm schrieb:
> I am not against having the possibility to get smaller, logically
> connected parts of the code base separately. What I do not want (and
> perhaps that was a misinterpretation of the original posting) is having
> different parts in different, distinct archives.
Of cours
Hi,
just stumbled about that the report design extension is built during the
regular build process, wouldn't it be better at all to create a source
tarball include jfreereport and reportdesign modules. Where we already
achieved modularization in the sources we should IHMO also do the right
pa
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Eg. the spellchecker (hunspell) itself is in the lingucomponent which I
propose to put to ooo-apps-extensions (and thus to ship it together with the
application). The dictionaries for it are in ooo-libs-3rdparty/dictionaries
- the distros have their own packages, but it s
Hello Everyone
I'm getting following error while building SRC680_m232 on Windows XP, Visual
C++ 2005.
___
-
/cygdrive/c/cygwin/home/skype2/cli_ure/source/native
-
guw.exe sn.exe -R ../../wntmsci11.pro/bin/cli_cppuhelper.dll
