? IMHO it should be empty or unset.
I don't think that it makes sense to check WITH_LANG in makefiles for
being empty or a space. For the time being I will do it to get the CWS
approved. But IMHO we should fix the build bots.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
would argue that maybe even setting
the CWS to ready for QA shouldn´t be allowed at all if there are tasks
with the wrong target.
Kind regards,
Bernd Eilers
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,
ACK.
If we think that we need that bullshit, the status should at least not
be set to failed before the CWS
Hi Davide,
On 19.06.2010 13:43, Davide Dozza wrote:
I'm still trzing to compile DEV300_m82 on WinXP and now I've found this
problem:
Entering /cygdrive/c/DEV300_82/instsetoo_native/util
dmake: makefile.mk: line 211: Warning: -- Prior to dmake 4.5 only one
%-target per target-definition
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
is that executing the smoke test is broken on that
machine in general. Can someone confirm this? And if that is true, can
we disable the smoke test on that machine until it is fixed?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org
Thanks!
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
the value of a less diverse build system. Most probably
because you don't have to maintain it. ;-)
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use
dependencies (not only) in the long
run is a worthwile goal and I wouldn't consider any change in the build
system that wouldn't go for it. Whether it's the number one or the
number two priority doesn't matter for me: IMHO it's a must have
priority. As always, YMMV.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
/idl compiling and that's it.
I think we should investigate their current makefiles and see how they
translate into systems using one of the possible candidates. Tomorrow I
will add this list to the wiki page Björn has started.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org
, now it's time to try your example and then talk
with Martin about his findings with our source code. I will report back.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 01/27/10 09:07, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
Yes, sure. If and only if you have target_link_libraries(some_exe
some_library) then the linker invocation for some_exe will have
'-lsome_library'. Whether or not it was built accidentally, CMake
AM, Mathias Bauer mathias.ba...@sun.com wrote:
So, how can we implement include, not execute with CMake?
You can do this, if it is absolutely necessary. I'll describe that at
the end of the message.
Consider that you have the modules A, B, C and D. D depends on B and C,
that both depend
are not masked.
So again: how can we implement include, not execute with CMake?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only
is
recursively calling them or - as we do today in OOo - serialize the
process. I don't think that this is a matter of performance per se, it's
just that the benefit is missing we wanted to get from the new single
make process approach.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead
.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
in the way Björn suggested.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Mathias,
most of the points you've raised I already replied to in my followup
to Bjoern (including my ideal msword lib makefile) -
Mathias Bauer wrote:
build.pl uses module dependencies, not target dependencies, so it has an
inherent susceptibility
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
So if you could explain how bjam (or any other make system that
someone wants to suggest here) solves our problems or why the
problems that require bjam to be resolved are even bigger than
those we try to fix, we might be able to get somewhere
environment and
some change in working style of the l10n teams. Maybe nobody dared to
ask for that because it was considered to be improbable that something
like that could be implemented?
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
every bet that everybody would do the same with the sensible
information that the master has the same failure as the CWS: read it
and forget it.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't
Helge Delfs - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
Hi,
On 09/23/09 08:29, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Really, this part of the work is superfluous. IMHO tests that are known
to be broken in a particular milestone should be skipped in a CWS based
on it also. So if you get a red state, you know
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer schrieb:
...
Currently the way how localizations get into OOo is very inefficient. At
some point in time a deadline is reached and a whole bunch of
localizable content is exported from the source tree and handed over.
Localizers do
should be glad to get them.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
, but it seems that those who had to do it refuse to do so.
PLEASE fix it.
+1
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de.
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
PS: Not sure, but I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be the better
places for this..
Are you sure that there is still someone listening on that list? ;-)
Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] is better.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project
with ATL :)
Thanks, and best regards,
Dooteo
Jatorrizko mezua: az., 2008-11-05 16:04 +0100, egilea: Mathias Bauer
Hi,
to get rid of the atl header problem on the ooo300 code line you have to
manually set the environment variable DISABLE_ATL to TRUE. For the
DEV300 code line this has been
Stefan Taxhet wrote:
[cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]; please follow-up there...]
Hi,
Nils Fuhrmann wrote:
* server preparation:
- migrate available keys from CN nach svn.services.openoffice.org:
open, needs discussion with Stefan
Heiner contacted me with this idea. My proposal was not
,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
Hi Eric,
Eric Hoch wrote:
Hi Mathias,
Am Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:48:47 +0200 schrieb Mathias Bauer:
Hi,
Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi,
How I can checkout DEV300 branch (OOo3) source code correctly?
According to CVSROOT/modules,
OpenOffice3 alias does not contain
apache-commons hyphen swext
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you know
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Kr/Concurrent_Checkout
I use it all the time. For a CWS on dev300 it needs an additional fix
that I could give you, but for checking out a milestone it is fine.
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
should IHMO also do the right
packaging of sources,
+1!
What already is separated shouldn't become munged with the rest. We know
how fast the separation can get lost. :-)
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http
it. ;-)
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent
into $CCACHE_DIR.
On VC2003 I got
Execvp error. Aborting.: No such file or directory
and on VC2005 it was something pointing out that the compiler couldn't
be detected. Is something missing in your description?
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
34 matches
Mail list logo
