Re: Component Naming Standards - Project Management

I concur, as long as the github switch is happening in the fairly near future. The team has consensus on the switch, but have we let Apache Infrastructure know? On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Gelinas, Derek wrote: > +1 > > On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Dave Neuman

Re: Component Naming Standards - Project Management

+1 On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Dave Neuman > wrote: To be honest, I would hold off on that for now since we should be moving to full github soon. Once we move to full github we can slice and dice things up. On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Durfey,

Re: Component Naming Standards - Project Management

To be honest, I would hold off on that for now since we should be moving to full github soon. Once we move to full github we can slice and dice things up. On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Durfey, Ryan wrote: > I wanted to start organizing the Jira issues and the first

Component Naming Standards - Project Management

I wanted to start organizing the Jira issues and the first thing I need to do is ensure components are assigned to each issue. The list looks pretty good, but I wanted to confirm a few before organizing? 1. Should we subdivide components like this? If yes, are all of these valid? *