I think we should keep votes open a minimum of 72 hours, regardless of how many
+1s come in.
—Eric
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Good thing I waited..Something went wrong with my git clone and a
> bunch of changes went in from master...
>
> -1 -- I'll get a new
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
Fwiw, that’s not generally how things work. You had stated that the vote was
very short (“end of the day”), so at a minimum you need to let that time pass.
The reason for this is
Good thing I waited..Something went wrong with my git clone and a
bunch of changes went in from master...
-1 -- I'll get a new one in tomorrow.
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorrow morning -- if you
> need more time,
ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorrow morning -- if you
need more time, let me know.
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
>
> I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly...
>
> Thanks all..
>
> -dan
>
We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly...
Thanks all..
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/
+1
On 02/16/2017 01:50 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 14ef03fd251b6306e67627c935f9111efb0284a
+1
I put together the tarball myself, but also downloaded the tarball
and verified checksums and signature from the downloaded files. Also
built from source.
Dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
>
> Changes