Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Jeremy Mitchell 
+1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Dave Neuman  wrote:

> +1, thanks for putting the vote up Jan
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Steve Malenfant 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Dave Neuman 
+1, thanks for putting the vote up Jan

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Steve Malenfant 
wrote:

> +1
>

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Chris Lemmons 
+1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:57 PM Steve Malenfant 
wrote:

> +1
>

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Steve Malenfant 
+1

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Durfey, Ryan 
+1
Ashish and I can help with moving the wiki, issues, and feature requests.

Ryan DurfeyM | 303-524-5099


From: "Gelinas, Derek" 
Reply-To: "dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org" 

Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 2:43 PM
To: "dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org" 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

+1

On May 18, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Elsloo 
> wrote:
+1 on moving.
--
Thanks,
Jeff
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Dan Kirkwood 
> wrote:
+1
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn 
> wrote:
In
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
Dave
mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
that thread if you are not familiar. I would like to call an official vote
on that.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub because...
Rgds,
JvD

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Gelinas, Derek 
+1

> On May 18, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Elsloo  wrote:
> 
> +1 on moving.
> --
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> 
> 
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Dan Kirkwood  wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn  wrote:
>>> In
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
>>> Dave
>>> mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
>>> that thread if you are not familiar. I would like to call an official vote
>>> on that.
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub because...
>>> 
>>> Rgds,
>>> JvD
>

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Jeff Elsloo 
+1 on moving.
--
Thanks,
Jeff


On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Dan Kirkwood  wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn  wrote:
>> In
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
>> Dave
>> mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
>> that thread if you are not familiar. I would like to call an official vote
>> on that.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>>  [ ] +1 Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub
>>  [ ]  0 No opinion
>>  [ ] -1 Do not Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub because...
>>
>> Rgds,
>> JvD

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Dan Kirkwood 
+1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn  wrote:
> In
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
> Dave
> mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
> that thread if you are not familiar. I would like to call an official vote
> on that.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
>  [ ] +1 Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub
>  [ ]  0 No opinion
>  [ ] -1 Do not Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub because...
>
> Rgds,
> JvD

[VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

2017-05-18 Thread Jan van Doorn 
In
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
Dave
mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
that thread if you are not familiar. I would like to call an official vote
on that.

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub
 [ ]  0 No opinion
 [ ] -1 Do not Move Traffic Control to use full GitHub because...

Rgds,
JvD

Re: Traffic Control SLA

2017-05-18 Thread Dave Neuman 
I feel like we aren't mature enough yet to formalize this.  We only have 1
official "release" under our belt and we are working towards our second.  I
think the best solution for now would be to try to define this as we go and
handle security, regressions, etc with discussions.
Of course, I can be convinced otherwise.


On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi All-
>   We had some discussion around what level of support we want to offer to
> users of our software.
>
>
>   I'd like to suggest a policy that for all releases we will fix all
> security issues and we will fix regressions at discretion of the release
> manager.
>
>   There was also discussion about how long we should support a release for.
>
>   Options included:
>   - Doing only 1-2 LTS releases per year
>   - Having many smaller point releases with 1 or 2 LTS releases per year.
>
>   We should also define the support timeline of an LTS release to say
> supporting the two most recent LTS at all times.
>
>   Thoughts?
>
>