- Original Message -
James,
Thanks for the feedback. I think Alan already addressed most of the
issues. Here are my comments on the remaining items.
Why do TSSslCertFindByName() and TSSslCertFindByAddress() take a TSSslVConn
argument?
I'm using the TSSslVConn to cache
Igor,
I'm using the TSSslVConn to cache a pointer to the global cert table
(loaded from ssl_multicert.config). Since in theory the
ssl_multicert.config could be reloaded at any point, we acquire() a copy
does this mean we would now support reloading of the ssl config w/o restart?
No. It
All;
I have created the 5.1.x branch. This is in preparation for the 5.1.0 release
of Traffic Server. All commits to this branch must be explicitly approved by
the Release Manager (amc). If you have something you really need to get in to
5.1.0, fix it on master first and then ask to have that
Searched around the web a bit...and am trying this:
adace@mound:~/Src/apache git clone
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver.git
...
adace@mound:~/Src/apache cd trafficserver
adace@mound:~/Src/apache/trafficserver git checkout 5.1.x
Branch 5.1.x set up to track remote branch 5.1.x
Adam,
adace@mound:~/Src/apache/trafficserver git checkout 5.1.x
Branch 5.1.x set up to track remote branch 5.1.x from origin.
Switched to a new branch '5.1.x'
adace@mound:~/Src/apache/trafficserver
Does that sound right?
Yes.
On Aug 20, 2014, at 5:33 AM, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
- Original Message -
James,
Thanks for the feedback. I think Alan already addressed most of the
issues. Here are my comments on the remaining items.
Why do TSSslCertFindByName() and
All;
I forgot to note that as part of the last triage a number of bugs were moved
from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 because of the lack of an available patch. If one of these
was yours, you will need to work on it on master for 5.2.0 and explicitly
request a back port to 5.1.0.
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Alan M. Carroll a...@network-geographics.com
wrote:
James,
I can answer a few of these.
Thanks for the docs, this looks very promising. When you are ready to submit
patches, this will need API review
Thanks. :-)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Alan M. Carroll
a...@network-geographics.com wrote:
Adam,
adace@mound:~/Src/apache/trafficserver git checkout 5.1.x
Branch 5.1.x set up to track remote branch 5.1.x from origin.
Switched to a new branch '5.1.x'
Hi!
I have ATS as a forward proxy working great and now I want to extend his
tentacles to protect the users.
Is there a run command on every transferred file plugin so when a user
start a download it runs a command (the antivirus client) on the file and
then on the result decides if it pass or
Hi all,
We have a feature to implement and are wondering if header-rewrite is the
right home for this feature. In a nutshell, when using ATS as a reverse
proxy, we want to redirect all http requests with a certain cookie to their
https counterparts but not using remap.config. The remap.config
On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Juan Pablo Daniel jpdbor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have ATS as a forward proxy working great and now I want to extend his
tentacles to protect the users.
Is there a run command on every transferred file plugin so when a user
start a download it runs a command
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Phil Sorber sor...@apache.org wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v4.2.2 (RC0) which is the latest stable
release in the 4.2.x series. This is the third release in our Long Term
Support (LTS) version as detailed in our Release Management document:
On 20 Aug 2014, at 22:35, James Peach wrote:
Is there a run command on every transferred file plugin so when a user
start a download it runs a command (the antivirus client) on the file and
then on the result decides if it pass or fails ?
Maybe https://www.ironbee.com can do this?
Indeed,
Hello,
first thanks you for replying :)
Using ironbee will make me add something else to my server, and it looks
like it's on a very early stage (with not secure and ready for production
banners and everything) , have you tried this with ATS? is it working well?
Is there any reason why not to do
15 matches
Mail list logo