+1 I've never used it.
On 5/4/18, 3:07 PM, "Bryan Call" wrote:
+1 - I don’t use it and it looks like it is broken on master
-Bryan
> On May 3, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not
maintained. D
+1
Scw00
> 在 2018年5月5日，上午5:23，CrazyCow 写道：
>
> +1 We've never used it too.
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 2:06 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>
>> +1 - I don’t use it and it looks like it is broken on master
>>
>> -Bryan
>>
>>> On May 3, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> I don’t think this
+1 We've never used it too.
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 2:06 PM Bryan Call wrote:
> +1 - I don’t use it and it looks like it is broken on master
>
> -Bryan
>
> > On May 3, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> >
> > I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not
> maintained. Does a
+1 - I don’t use it and it looks like it is broken on master
-Bryan
> On May 3, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not maintained.
> Does anyone have any objections to nuking it for ATS v8.0.0 ? Fwiw, this
> script was intende
+1
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 9:50 AM shinr...@ieee.org wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Derek Dagit
> wrote: +1 to remove it.
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and
+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Derek Dagit wrote:
+1 to remove it.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not maintained.
> Does anyone have any objections to nuking it for A
+1 to remove it.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not maintained.
> Does anyone have any objections to nuking it for ATS v8.0.0 ? Fwiw, this
> script was intended as a replacement for an older C++ version of
> traf
I don’t think this script has a purpose any more, and it’s not maintained. Does
anyone have any objections to nuking it for ATS v8.0.0 ? Fwiw, this script was
intended as a replacement for an older C++ version of traffic_shell, which we
already removed.
Cheers,
— Leif
