Hi Hongfei,
Recently, we faced a memory leak on the following redirect with 8.1.1[*1].
The fix[*2] is coming in the next release, 8.1.2 and 9.0.1.
If you didn't have your leak with 8.1.0, it might be the same leak.
> 1. Inside HttpSM, which states require allocate/re-use ioBuf? Is there a
way to
Thanks Fei. There weren’t SSL/TLS sessions in our environment but I do feel
some of memory are being held by ‘dormant’ sessions. The total of amount of
memory held by freelist (44G) was however surprisingly high. Majority of that
(99%) are allocated through and held by ioBufAllocator. I am wond
Not saying this is the exact cause, but we've seen similar behavior
previously. The reason for our issue was the session cache size was set to
a size too big compared to the ram size, and since the sessions stored in
the cache are only removed when the cache is full, and inserting new
sessions caus
