- Original Message -
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 0d886aabb - a263d384d
small change to make eclipse happy
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/commit/a263d384
Tree:
On Oct 17, 2013, at 6:21 AM, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
- Original Message -
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 0d886aabb - a263d384d
small change to make eclipse happy
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
Commit:
+1
-Bryan
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:33 PM, James Peach jpe...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
process. The rationale for this is:
- API is important enough that we should go to extra effort to make it
consistent and
Hi folks-
Want to get a sense of configuration settings that folks typically
change, in hopes of changing some of ATS' default settings. For
instance, I'm betting that most people change storage.config to have a
cache bigger than 256MB.
What other settings do you usually change?
Thanks!
miles
On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the review James.
I agree with most of your points -- with a couple of exceptions:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org wrote:
Updated
On Oct 17, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Miles Libbey mlib...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks-
Want to get a sense of configuration settings that folks typically
change, in hopes of changing some of ATS' default settings. For
instance, I'm betting that most people change storage.config to have a
cache
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:45:41 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 7ba121c9a - 3c0c835c1
On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:45:41 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org
On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:45:41 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar ushac...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org
+1
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:33 PM, James Peach jpe...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
process. The rationale for this is:
- API is important enough that we should go to extra effort to make it
consistent and
+1
On Thursday, October 17, 2013, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
+1
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:33 PM, James Peach jpe...@apache.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
process. The rationale for this is:
- API is important enough
+1
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, James Peach jpe...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
process. The rationale for this is:
- API is important enough that we should go to extra effort to
make it consistent and
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:33 PM, James Peach jpe...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
process. The rationale for this is:
+1! Lets get it on the Wiki under the development processes section.
I'd add a section on experimental there
13 matches
Mail list logo
