Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-04-22 Thread Gunnar Tapper
Looking at the list, IN-10 is where we may have more work to do. Otherwise, 2.0 should be ready for graduation IMO. Gunnar On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Stack wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Pierre Smits > wrote: > > > Maybe we should do

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-04-21 Thread Stack
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Maybe we should do the maturity assessment (see > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > ) > and take it from there... > > I like that page Pierre. Looks like a useful set of tests

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-04-01 Thread Carol Pearson
Hi St.Ack, You're welcome - I love playing with data. I interpret those numbers the same way - we need to focus on diversity and traffic levels (and do another release beyond 2.0). Our user list activity has jumped thanks to those efforts and that's a good thing - having activity there makes

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-31 Thread Stack
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Carol Pearson wrote: > > > So we're seeing some additional participation but it's still heavily > dominated by Esgyn. > > We need to work on getting our diversity quotient and general traffic on the lists up, it looks like. Thanks for

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-31 Thread Pierre Smits
Look at how Apache Flink is doing the reporting on the community: https://flink.apache.org/news/2015/12/18/a-year-in-review.html Maybe we can learn from this. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-31 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi Carol, all, You are right, numbers without context mean nothing. It is all about correlation. Yet, one must start to measure first before the insights can be created. But it must not be the end goal. It must all be seen in relation to adoption, community growth and health. Best regards,

RE: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-30 Thread Steve Varnau
he.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 6:57 PM > To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > A > > distribution with Apache only e

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Pierre Smits
Probably a good provider of insights on contributor activity is the 'Who sent it' overview at http://trafodion.markmail.org/search/?q= Unfortunately I can't compare the numbers against those in https://pony-poc.apache.org . There must be something wrong there. Best regards, Pierre Smits

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Pierre Smits
I agree wholeheartedly with you on the various benefits you implied. ;-) For sure, working towards the next release will iron out some wrinkles. We're not in a rush and can wait for that. But this discussion is good to get all blocking issues on the table (it is not a vote). Then we get a feel

RE: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Dave Birdsall
] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 11:55 AM To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > To address the list: > > Regarding the community: > You can

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Carol Pearson
Hi Stack, Thanks for the summary! I've been monitoring our users and where they're coming from, as well as users -> contributors -> committers pathways. I've looked at github stats and email participation stats in particular. I'm travelling down to San Jose right now for Strata/Hadoopworld and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Carol Pearson
; > > > > Great. Thats good progress. > Thanks Avinash, > Michael > > > > > Thanks > > Avinash > > > > > > > > From: saint@gmail.com <saint@gmail.com> on behalf of Stack < >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Hans Zeller
> > > Avinash > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > From: saint@gmail.com <saint@gmail.com> on behalf of Stack < > > > st...@duboce.net> > > > Sent: 29 March 2016 18:56 > > &

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Stack
sh, Michael > Thanks > Avinash > > > > From: saint@gmail.com <saint@gmail.com> on behalf of Stack < > st...@duboce.net> > Sent: 29 March 2016 18:56 > To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Tim

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Avinash Dongre
net> Sent: 29 March 2016 18:56 To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > As we have released our 1.3.0 version and this projects shows

Re: [DISCUSSION] Time to graduate

2016-03-29 Thread Stack
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi all, > > As we have released our 1.3.0 version and this projects shows a healthy > community, it seems to me that we are on the brink of graduating this > project out its incubator status. > > What do you think?