+1 for JIRA.
JIRA is more powerful. Beginners may need to sign up for a JIRA account,
but I don't think this is a barrier for developers.
俊平堵 于2019年12月26日周四 上午11:59写道：
> Thanks waterlx for comments and raised questions - that's next discussion I
> would like to call.
> Hadoop use a different way
Thanks waterlx for comments and raised questions - that's next discussion I
would like to call.
Hadoop use a different way - most of discussions are happening on JIRA
instead of github, but it really depends on how the tubemq community think.
Thanks,
Junping
李响 于2019年12月26日周四 上午10:45写道：
> +1 f
+1 for JIRA to track issue.
Another topic is how to review and comment code ? HBase currently prefers
using JIRA to track issue, putting a link to github on JIRA and reviewing
on github. (Please correct me if I am wrong about that) In that way, it
seems lead to that we have almost nothing but only
+1 for JIRA
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:59 AM osgooli(李致波) wrote:
> +1 for JIRA
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: 俊平堵
> 发送时间: 2019年12月25日 11:13
> 收件人: dev@tubemq.apache.org
> 主题: [DISCUSS] Shall we use JIRA or Github issue to track issues?(Internet
> mail)
>
> Hi,
> Continue with TubeMQ's wechat grou
+1 for JIRA.
Github Issue is not as powerful as JIRA.
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Kayne Wu wrote:
> +1 for JIRA
> JIRA a more open place, with more developers participating in development
> and discussions,
> which helps tubemq to develop and growing faster.
>
>
>
> Goson zhang 于2019年12月
+1 for JIRA
-邮件原件-
发件人: 俊平堵
发送时间: 2019年12月25日 11:13
收件人: dev@tubemq.apache.org
主题: [DISCUSS] Shall we use JIRA or Github issue to track issues?(Internet mail)
Hi,
Continue with TubeMQ's wechat group discussion, shall we use JIRA or Github
issue to track issues for TubeMQ?
My re
+1 for JIRA
JIRA a more open place, with more developers participating in development
and discussions,
which helps tubemq to develop and growing faster.
Goson zhang 于2019年12月26日周四 上午9:38写道：
> +1 for JIRA.
>
> tison 于2019年12月25日周三 上午11:19写道：
>
> > +1 for JIRA.
> >
> > JIRA provides rich func
+1 for JIRA.
tison 于2019年12月25日周三 上午11:19写道：
> +1 for JIRA.
>
> JIRA provides rich functions for tagging & releasing which, in GitHub,
> should
> take more efforts to setup and maintain. Also I second that JIRA is hosted
> by Apache makes it more reliable for TubeMQ an Apache project.
>
> As a r
