[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3853) PolicyProvider.configureBinding() is called with a configuration object that does not contain Axis2's ConfigurationContext on client/reference side.

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3853: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 PolicyProvider.configureBinding() is called with a configuration

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3852) SOAP Envelope is not available from the response message context in PolicyInterceptor.invoke() after getNext().invoke() returns.

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3852: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 SOAP Envelope is not available from the response message context

Re: [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3861) All the Tuscany Maven plugins have the wrong name

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:27 AM, ant elder (JIRA) dev@tuscany.apache.org wrote:     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-3861: ---    Priority:

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3106) Correct composite include processing to match OASIS

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3106. - Resolution: Fixed Neglected to resolve this at the time Correct composite include processing

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3188) Is the Warning/Error raised correct when SCDL interface callback config doesn't match component type dervied from component

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3188. - Resolution: Fixed I believe that this was fixed Is the Warning/Error raised correct when

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3710) ASM_9004 - Default binding exposes remote endpoints in nested composites.

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3710: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Looks like this is still happening ASM_9004 - Default binding

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3711) ASM_9004

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3711: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Haven't checked this yet. ASM_9004 Key

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-2801) Creat system contribution to hold all definitions.xml data so that policy reosolution is consistent across multiple contributions

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2801. - Resolution: Fixed There is now a system contribution in 2.x Creat system contribution

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3443) Devise a away to track and spi changes we make in 2.x

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3443. - Resolution: Fixed We now haw the itest/spi test Devise a away to track and spi changes we

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3757) Asynch programming model doesn't support Void return types.

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3757. - Resolution: Fixed I believe it does now Asynch programming model doesn't support Void return

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3784) Make the async programming model support void return types

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3784. - Resolution: Fixed I believe this works now Make the async programming model support void

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3513) Develop a tool that is able to report on the runtime configuration of a running Tuscany node

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3513. - Resolution: Fixed The shell work that Ant has done pretty much satisfies this. Develop

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3785) In the async programming model remove the need in the infrastructure for the forward call to use exceptions to unwind the call stack

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3785. - Resolution: Fixed Done, the Tuscany wire now supports the ability to pass a message in request

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3786) In the async programming model provide a clear separate between the Java specific bits and the infrastructure bits so it can be used by other implementation types

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3786. - Resolution: Fixed I think the code changes that Mike committed are good enough for now

[jira] [Resolved] (TUSCANY-3801) Add ability to deal with bindings that natively support async interactions

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3801. - Resolution: Fixed For example, the JMS binding now supports native async Add ability to deal

Closing async JIRA

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Laws
Hi I've been going though again closing JIRA that I think are resolved. For the async ones I just closed one [1] that's assigned to Mike without noticing. Mike, could you take a look at these and see which ones you;re happy to close down now. They were generally recoded as children of 3783 [2]

Re: node-manager questions

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: ...snip It looks like this fits very weel in the concept of JAX-RS resource/sub-resource http://incubator.apache.org/wink/1.1.1/html/JAX-RS%20Resources,%20HTTP%20Methods,%20and%20Paths.html The idea is that you

Re: svn commit: r1124705 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules: core-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/runtime/ core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/core/assembly/impl/ deployment/src/m

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:21 PM, antel...@apache.org wrote: Author: antelder Date: Thu May 19 12:21:55 2011 New Revision: 1124705 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1124705view=rev Log: Add a way to run commands on remote nodes and add Node API and Shell commands to start and stop

Re: svn commit: r1124705 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules: core-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/runtime/ core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/core/assembly/impl/ deployment/src/m

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
I've mostly finished with the first cut of this set of changes i've been doing with getting distributed nodes working well so i'll post a summary of that to the ML shortly and we can review what things like the DomainRegistry interface has on it.    ...ant Ok, great. Simon -- Apache

Re: svn commit: r1124713 - in /tuscany/sandbox/slaws/domain-view/src/main: java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/domain/ resources/

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
Note also that the current code doesn't seem to work perfectly yet as its not including the xmlns=http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912; attribute, I've not debugged it so not sure it thats a problem in the getDomainComposite method or Utils.modelToXML. An example is: composite

Re: svn commit: r1124713 - in /tuscany/sandbox/slaws/domain-view/src/main: java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/domain/ resources/

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Laws
Mmm. There is the getQNameDefinition method on the Node interface which is supposed to help with that. The spec section says: * 4695 10.7.4 get QName Definition * 4696 In order to make sense of the domain-level composite (as returned by get Domain-Level Composite), it * 4697

Re: Utility to pretty print xml for the model objects

2011-05-17 Thread Simon Laws
It sounds like in JDK6 org.w3c.dom.ls.LSSerializer should be used, i've added some code to try that here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/assembly-xml/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/xml/Utils.java It still doesn't seem perfect code, and it

Re: Next 2.x release

2011-05-17 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've

Re: node-manager questions

2011-05-16 Thread Simon Laws
We already have other ways to get at this information with things like the command line Shell, the programmatic DomainNode APIs, and the Maven plugin. The JMX GSoC project will likely also provide another way to get at the information. So it would be really good if where possible they all

Re: node-manager questions

2011-05-16 Thread Simon Laws
...snip It looks like this fits very weel in the concept of JAX-RS resource/sub-resource http://incubator.apache.org/wink/1.1.1/html/JAX-RS%20Resources,%20HTTP%20Methods,%20and%20Paths.html The idea is that you define a top level resource, that handles the domain path, then it could

Re: node-manager questions

2011-05-13 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I think having a web page to access the domain is a great idea. I'd like to see a more comprehensive URL space support in the future. For example, this is what came to mind when I actually sat down and put pen

Re: svn commit: r1102283 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/domain-node/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/impl/NodeImpl.java

2011-05-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:19 PM, antel...@apache.org wrote: Author: antelder Date: Thu May 12 13:19:17 2011 New Revision: 1102283 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102283view=rev Log: Remove the allNodes static as its not used by anything Modified:    

Re: svn commit: r1102283 - /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/domain-node/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/impl/NodeImpl.java

2011-05-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:59 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:19 PM,  antel...@apache.org wrote: Author: antelder Date: Thu May 12 13:19:17 2011 New Revision: 1102283 URL: http

node-manager questions

2011-05-12 Thread Simon Laws
I think having a web page to access the domain is a great idea. I'd like to see a more comprehensive URL space support in the future. For example, this is what came to mind when I actually sat down and put pen to paper. http://somehost:someport/sca/ {domainname}/- get the

Re: Board report time

2011-05-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Ah yes, thanks for the correction.   ...ant On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: I need to submit an ASF board report next week, if anyone has things to mention let me

Re: [NOTICE] Nirmal Fernando voted website committer

2011-05-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: The Tuscany PMC has voted to make Nirmal Fernando as a website committer. Congratulations, and have fun helping enhancing/fixing our website. Congratulations Nirmal, and thanks for being willing to help

getting domain information

2011-05-11 Thread Simon Laws
Quick question. Ant, I notice that you've been adding more information to the endpoint (domain?) registry. Also there are some operations in the domain node that use some of that information to present information, such as the domain composite. Is that information available from a domain node

Re: getting domain information

2011-05-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:56 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: Quick question. Ant, I notice that you've been adding more information to the endpoint (domain?) registry. Also there are some operations

Re: getting domain information

2011-05-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:56 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: Quick question. Ant, I notice that you've been adding more

Re: Next 2.x release (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-05-09 Thread Simon Laws
-Original Message- From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonsl...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:08 AM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org; antel...@apache.org Subject: Re: Next 2.x release On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM

Re: OOM fails running the Java CAA compliance tests

2011-05-09 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:47 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Another issue i have getting the build running on a new machine is that the Java CAA compliance test suite always fails with an OutOfMemoryError. It doesn't matter how I run that, in a full build the suite on its own, or

Re: Next 2.x release

2011-05-04 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've said previously. How about the make this the last beta then get down to doing

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3776) New JCAA tests faile

2011-05-04 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3776. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 They all pass now New JCAA tests faile

Re: What version? 1.x or 2.x

2011-05-03 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: +1. For all of the 2011 GSoC projects for Tuscany, we should work on Tuscany 2.x. Thanks, Raymond Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apache Tuscany PMC

Re: Next 2.x release

2011-05-03 Thread Simon Laws
What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else do we need to get done before we're ready for a 2.0 release? If its a short list of todo's should we just work on getting those done and going straight to 2.0

Re: Next 2.x release

2011-05-03 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else do we need

Re: GSOC 2011 Projects

2011-04-28 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Guilherme Armigliatto guilhermearmiglia...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Im very happy to help this community with the project Support for SCA Components Implement Written in Scala. I would like to thank everyone who helped in developing this project,

Re: [GSoC 2011] Appreciation for acceptance

2011-04-26 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: Congratulations! We look forward to working out the feature so that we can see nice SCA assembly diagrams soon :-) Thanks, Raymond Raymond Feng

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-26 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:09 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: What is it needed for? If its just for tests to set the http port to default to 8085 instead of 8080 then there is a static field on the http

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-26 Thread Simon Laws
, Simon Laws wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:09 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: What is it needed for? If its just for tests to set the http port to default to 8085 instead of 8080 then there is a static

Re: Accepted the Proposal for Develop a 'NoSQL' Datastore component for Apache Cassandra, CouchDB, Hadoop/Hbase

2011-04-26 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara 0704...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am happy to inform you that I have selected for the project Develop a 'NoSQL' Datastore component for Apache Cassandra, CouchDB, Hadoop/Hbase [1] and my proposal can be found at [2] and I am really happy

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-20 Thread Simon Laws
You can use the Shell load command with one of those node.xml files. The name load to match the TuscanyRuntime loadFromXML method. I've just updated the startDeployables attribute to default to true which answers the comment in the Tuscany class about how to start it, and that also means it

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-20 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:32 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: You can use the Shell load command with one of those node.xml files. The name load to match the TuscanyRuntime loadFromXML method. I've just

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-20 Thread Simon Laws
...snip . The only other part of the file thats used by the Shell/TuscanyRuntime is the domainURI attribute. How are the binding base uris configured? Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-20 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:38 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: ...snip . The only other part of the file thats used by the Shell/TuscanyRuntime is the domainURI attribute. How are the binding base uris

Re: Domain testing

2011-04-20 Thread Simon Laws
What is it needed for? If its just for tests to set the http port to default to 8085 instead of 8080 then there is a static field on the http server class which tests can set.   ...ant So here's a scenario. One the same machine start two Tuscany nodes to run two composites from the same

Domain testing

2011-04-19 Thread Simon Laws
I committed a new version of two-nodes-two-vms-hazelcast. I called the new one two-jvm-hazelcast to match up with the existing one-jvm-* names. I'll remove the old one shortly. The new one's not in the build as it doesn't shut down properly. I was though pleasantly surprised that the distributed

one-shot operation for shell?

2011-04-18 Thread Simon Laws
I want to make the ant running tuscany sample without writing any launcher code. To make this work smoothly I'd like to fire up the shell have it launch the contribution (which runs some stuff on @init) and the shut down again. Is there a way of configuring this? Scripting was discussed a while

Re: one-shot operation for shell?

2011-04-18 Thread Simon Laws
will that be done?   ...ant On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I want to make the ant running tuscany sample without writing any launcher code. To make this work smoothly I'd like to fire up the shell have it launch the contribution (which runs some stuff

Re: Problem when copying 1.6.2 maven artifacts to m2-ibiblio-incubating-repository

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: Raymond Feng wrote: Maven sometimes need to resolve the artifact to a range of versions or the LATEST. I think the versions in the XML

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Laws
I added in a few running tuscany samples to see if we can get those right. Things of note: - There are a small set now. We can complete the set if people are happy - I've added the minimum function required. So, for example, there is no ant build/run script under the JSE sample. That would go

Re: [GSoC 2011] Implement support for SCA components written in Scala

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Laws
Thanks for the various links chaps. I read through the proposal Guilherme. Looks good. Maybe we could have a chat about it. gtalk, irc...? Regards Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Re: [GSoC 2011] Implement support for SCA components written in Scala

2011-04-13 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Guilherme Armigliatto guilhermearmiglia...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, My name is Guilherme Armigliatto, I am Master degree student in Computer Science at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil. I have applied for the GSoC 2011 with the project Implement

Re: Interface information in the endpoint registry

2011-04-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:19 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Presently the endpoint registry doesn't hold any information on the interfaces of an endpoint. In the past we have talked about adding something and I wondered about starting to look at that now. As an example of one thing

Re: Interface information in the endpoint registry

2011-04-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:19 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Presently the endpoint registry doesn't hold any information

Re: Interface information in the endpoint registry

2011-04-12 Thread Simon Laws
Doing a search for a cast to a java interface - (JavaInterface) - shows quite a lot of hits probably most of which are fine but one example of where it isn't is line 134 of JSONRPCServiceBindingProvider.   ...ant Interesting. I see your point. I'm not sure that the TODO comment is

Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum standards for released samples

2011-04-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: For the past 2.x releases we've acknowledged that the samples haven't been perfect but have done releases anyway, are you suggesting we should stop doing that and get the samples more perfect before any more

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 1.6.2 RC1

2011-04-11 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:04 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: +1   ...ant On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: Please review and vote on RC1 of the SCA Java 1.6.2 release. The distribution artifacts, RAT report, Eclipse update site, and Maven staging

Re: Building problem with the trunk

2011-03-16 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara 0704...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry to embarrass you, the fault was on my side. I used a wrong command when I manually install an artifact. After removing some files from the m2 repository I recovered from the error. The good news is

Re: GSoC project idea : Develop a 'NoSQL' Datastore component for Apache Cassandra, CouchDB, Hadoop/Hbase

2011-03-14 Thread Simon Laws
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: On 03/11/2011 05:26 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara wrote: Hi Jean-Sebastien, Thanks for interesting the project and glad have you as the project mentor. If you can show me some points which I need to do/look as a

Re: Building problem with the trunk

2011-03-14 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara 0704...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for not entering the commands in previous mail. The commands I used was, 1. set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx128M 2. mvn thanks That's a bit odd that dependency should be coming in through the following pom entry

Re: Building problem with the trunk

2011-03-14 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara 0704...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, I am on Ubuntu 10.04. java version 1.6.0_20. Apache Maven 2.2.1. thanks I'm on the same Java but Maven 2.2.0. That's on widows. On Redhat I'm on slightly back-levels of Java and Maven. Needless to say

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3842) Node restart performance degrades as more restarts are performed.

2011-03-10 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3842. --- Resolution: Fixed Changes committed at 1079366 and updated by changes for TUSCANY-3843 Node

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3842) Node restart performance degrades as more restarts are performed.

2011-03-08 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
Components: SCA Java Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0 Environment: WinXP Sun JDK 1.6.0-20 Reporter: Simon Laws Ant has a Node unit test (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/node-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/node

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-3842) Node restart performance degrades as more restarts are performed.

2011-03-08 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3842: --- Assignee: Simon Laws Node restart performance degrades as more restarts are performed

2.x Node restart perforace

2011-03-08 Thread Simon Laws
I checked in a change under TUSCANY-3842 at revision: 1079366 which deserves a bit of discussion. This was motivated by playing with a node restart test that Ant added [1]. Looking at the code in NodeImpl.start() it used to do the following: try { if (contributions ==

Re: Tuscany Meetup in London

2011-03-06 Thread Simon Laws
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Mike, hopefully there will be other occasions soon, see you next time :) Summing up the thread, we're going to meet up Monday, 7th March, 11.30 am at Cafe Zest [1]. Looking forward to seeing you, Florian [1] 

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-03-03 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: I meant to add, if working offline using local artifacts is useful/important then i wonder if that should also be possible with the Maven builds in the

Re: Fast Java runtime bootstrap for mass virtual hosting

2011-03-03 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelf...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Recently I've been experimenting with ways to speed up the bootstrap of the Java runtime to support mass virtual hosting. I thought I'd share my findings here. Here's a summary of the use case: -

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-03-02 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Yang, Gang CTR US USA gang.y...@us.army.mil wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE The picture is worth thousands of words. Thanks, Simon. It really helps understanding the architecture and thinking process. I think the basic approach of treating

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-03-02 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:12 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: ant elder wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:17 AM, ant elder

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-03-02 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Yang, Gang CTR US USA gang.y...@us.army.mil wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE --- Cut --- Absolutely and we can already create Axis handlers from our policy providers if required. Although these are  of course specific to Axis. Really? Are

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-03-01 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:09 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:24 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW i've now added an Ant build.xml to the helloworld sample at: https

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-03-01 Thread Simon Laws
I put a diagram of my understanding of the current 2.x binding.ws/policy interceptor situation here [1] along with some comments relating to the issues we've been discussing (the first four numbered comments relate to Gang's numbered comments). Some of these issues are I think resolvable given the

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-28 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: I wonder whether we need the ability to run from maven at all. We need a way for people to compile samples of course. I've be happy

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-28 Thread Simon Laws
, Very good summary. My comments follow. Gang -Original Message- From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonsl...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:18 PM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue

2.0 binary distribution - was: Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-28 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-28 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:24 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW i've now added an Ant build.xml to the helloworld sample at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/unreleased/samples/helloworld-contribution/. That build does not use jars from a  binary

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3839) Generic reference policy interceptors are not being added to the reference chain

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3839. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.x Fox committed at revision: 1074462 Generic

2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Laws
Following up on Gang's thread about policy handling in 1.x and getting the right effect when trying to apply security policy with the Web Services binding I'm looking at how policy is applied in 2.x. I've created a test case [1] which has three components with the same implementation:

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Laws
I Think the following are the issues that Gang has raised across the various mail threads. I'll add 2.x comments shortly. TUSCANY-3822 - Service side afterInvoker should be called with the outbound Axis MC Gang has correct the call to afterInvoke. Demonstrated in two attachments to JIRA.

Re: 2.x Policy interceptors - was: Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-25 Thread Simon Laws
Let me try that again with formatting and with 2.x comments As previously discussed the 2,x binding specific interceptor model is different from the 1.x model. Policy processing can intercept the message flow in two places Generically on the operation specific wire In a binding specific way

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-24 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Can you please add me to the contributors for the Tuscany blog with my gmail address so I can post the release announcement? Also, is it possible to post an announcement on the ASF blog [1] and ASF Twitter account [2]? [1] 

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-24 Thread Simon Laws
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I was thinking that in this case READMEs would only contain some instructions on how to start the shell so it will basically be the same README copied in each and every folder. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:02 PM, ant

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Laws
Re the doc, what sort of thing do we want? I don't think what we tried with the beta1 release with having the sample doc only on the Tuscany website worked that well, so these samples just have a plain text README file. What could be done differently or better over that?   ...ant I agree.

Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Laws
Hi Gang Comments in line. Generally I still think the processing we have in 2.x is too late/early for you to get at the envelope to decrypt/encrypt it before the Axis2 engine has a go at it. It may be the answer is to map part of the handler chain into Axis2 handlers (as you have already done)

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-3837) Move SCABindingMapper interface to core-spi

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3837. --- Resolution: Fixed Changes committed to 2.x Move SCABindingMapper interface to core-spi

Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-22 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: Gang Yang wrote: --- Cut --- How about plugging your code into an Axis2 handler instead of a Tuscany handler?  Is there is a way to get control after Axis2 has built the SOAPFault and before the fault is sent on the wire?  

Re: 2.0 Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)

2011-02-21 Thread Simon Laws
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:08 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:10 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: I have now done these. There's a beta2 branch for the release, and all the trunk

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3837) Move SCABindingMapper interface to core-spi

2011-02-21 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
Runtime Reporter: Simon Laws Move the SCABindingMapper interface out of the binding sca runtime module into core-spi so that people wanting to implement their own mapper don't have to depend on runtime pacakges. See http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg15668.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-18 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. The artifacts are at: http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/

Re: Memory leaks around JAXB context

2011-02-18 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Scott Kurz scottk...@gmail.com wrote: Simon, The cache allows us to reuse the JAXBContext across repeated service invocations.   The fact that you don't hit the cache again

Re: PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-18 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Yang, Gang CTR US USA gang.y...@us.army.mil wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Hi, I’m continuing implementing WS-security using PolicyHandler framework in Tuscany 1.6.1. I found that when SOAPFault is generated, the

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:37 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote: Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. The artifacts are at: http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/ The

Memory leaks around JAXB context

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Laws
I've been looking at TUSCANY-3835 for a day or so. This is a bit of therapeutic writing down of what I've found to see if I can make sense of it. I've initially been looking at the 1.x code base but I expect the similar things are true of the 2.x code base. This started as I noticed that over

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >