Hi Dan,
Dan Kegel wrote:
Christian Junker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Apologies if I'm treading old ground, or anyone's toes, or spouding
nonsense.
I have hardly looked at the UDK before. I do have some experience
supporting multiple versions of g++, though.]
Is that practical? If it
Hello Marten, Dan, *
Go away from language bindings at the first
level API and make a totally language independent
API with a defined call structure for C.
I don't see the problem, maybe I don't get your point.
The main UNO base libraries like libcppu and libsal and every bridge
library
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
The core is already 'C' based. Please see my other posting.
Your other post made it clear that the core is C++
internally, but exports only pure C functions to the world. Right?
That's not quite 'C' based, because of the symbol versioning
problems
