(restoring original copy list)
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: deploying to repository.apache.org: gpg signatures on
.sha512
checksums required?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:50:22 -0400
From: Marshall Schor
To: us...@infra.apache.org
Only missing signatures
I have a patch to the plugin that I need to get some time to test. I'm the
bottle neck unfortunately. Is the rule blocking only because of the missing
signature or is it balking at the hashes too?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:05 AM Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following more requests to update o
Hi,
Following more requests to update our builds to generate .sha512 checksums, we
changed our "parent-pom" to do this, but now find we can't upload artifacts to
repository.apache.org unless we also change our builds to do gpg-signatures for
the .sha512 checksums (which seems overreaching).
I fou