need 1 more vote?
-M
On 2/5/2018 4:28 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's rc4 of uimaj 3.0.0 sdk.
>
> The change since rc3: some fixes to the logging APIs to avoid "double
> scanning"
> of substitution when using logrb style calls, some formatting of the messages
> fixes for logging,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Burn Lewis closed UIMA-5390.
Assignee: Burn Lewis
> DUCC may restart failing custom services forever
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Burn Lewis resolved UIMA-5390.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Problem was not the lack of an initialization phase ... runtime errors were not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik closed UIMA-3812.
---
> DUCC check_ducc will warn about 0 swap configured
> -
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik closed UIMA-5734.
---
> check_ducc & start_ducc problem when Banner is enabled in sshd_config
>
Hi,
the UIMA-DUCC 2.2.2 release candidate 3 is ready for voting.
This version contains the following fixes since RC2:
- DUCC Web Server (WS) logs queries to DB too verbosely
- DUCC may restart failing custom services forever
- check_ducc & start_ducc problem when Banner is enabled in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik closed UIMA-5551.
---
> Add registry support so pull services can locate their server
>
Finally
- checked signatures: OK
- spot checked readme, release notes, license, etc.: OK
- after converting many JCas classes recompiled a large set of projects
using the maven artifacts: OK
- ran a multi-annotator pipeline and compared with V2 results: OK
- built from source & checked
Richard - did you find anything else that might affect the release decision, in
your testing?
-Marshall
On 2/26/2018 9:32 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> On 26.02.2018, at 15:11, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> After a bit more thought, I feel there are always going to be