[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6486) Fix for FileUtil vulnerability in UIMA 2.*?

2023-01-23 Thread Benjamin De Boe (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17679777#comment-17679777 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-6486: --- It seems this was addressed for v3.3.* through UIMA-6469

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6486) Fix for FileUtil vulnerability in UIMA 2.*?

2023-01-23 Thread Benjamin De Boe (Jira)
Benjamin De Boe created UIMA-6486: - Summary: Fix for FileUtil vulnerability in UIMA 2.*? Key: UIMA-6486 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6486 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5776) Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on prior annotations to fail

2018-05-17 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16478877#comment-16478877 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-5776: --- Hi Peter, thanks for picking this up.  This is the default

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5776) Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on prior annotations to fail

2018-05-15 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin De Boe updated UIMA-5776: -- Description: We're having trouble leveraging a UIMACPP engine from Ruta. Whereas the ENGINE()

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-5776) Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on even prior annotations to fail

2018-05-15 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
Benjamin De Boe created UIMA-5776: - Summary: Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on even prior annotations to fail Key: UIMA-5776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5776 Project: UIMA

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5776) Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on prior annotations to fail

2018-05-15 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin De Boe updated UIMA-5776: -- Summary: Calling a UIMACPP engine causes rules on prior annotations to fail (was: Calling a

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5041) JsonCasSerializer creates duplicate shortname

2016-08-05 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409564#comment-15409564 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-5041: --- Sounds good to me. Thanks for the quick resolution! >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5041) JsonCasSerializer creates duplicate shortname

2016-08-05 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin De Boe updated UIMA-5041: -- Description: Our type system includes a type named "com.intersys.uima.annotation.iknow.TOP",

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-5041) JsonCasSerializer creates duplicate shortname

2016-08-05 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
Benjamin De Boe created UIMA-5041: - Summary: JsonCasSerializer creates duplicate shortname Key: UIMA-5041 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5041 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4899) UIMACPP access violation in destroyJNI()

2016-07-19 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15383874#comment-15383874 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-4899: --- Well, we'd love to help more, but we don't know if there's

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4899) UIMACPP access violation in destroyJNI()

2016-07-01 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358575#comment-15358575 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-4899: --- Any updates on whether and/or when this could be addressed

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-4899) UIMACPP access violation in destroyJNI()

2016-04-25 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin De Boe updated UIMA-4899: -- Summary: UIMACPP access violation in destroyJNI() (was: UIMACPP access violation when running

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4899) UIMACPP access violation when running in multiple threads

2016-04-25 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15256278#comment-15256278 ] Benjamin De Boe commented on UIMA-4899: --- After some more debugging, it seems this is probably a

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-4900) UIMACPP 64bit issue

2016-04-18 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
Benjamin De Boe created UIMA-4900: - Summary: UIMACPP 64bit issue Key: UIMA-4900 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4900 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: C++

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-4899) UIMACPP access violation when running in multiple threads

2016-04-18 Thread Benjamin De Boe (JIRA)
Benjamin De Boe created UIMA-4899: - Summary: UIMACPP access violation when running in multiple threads Key: UIMA-4899 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4899 Project: UIMA Issue