[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15119278#comment-15119278 ]
Serge Huber commented on UNOMI-8: --------------------------------- 2. (good to fix): the NOTICE file can be improved cleaned up: - NOTICE has extra information. There is no need to add anything to NOTICE for MIT license software [1] or (usually) for Apache licensed software. [2] NOTICE needs to be keep small. [7] - NOTICE may be missing information. Hyperic Sigar contains a NOTICE file (which incorrectly lists MIT and Apache software). [12] It may be that some of these notices need to be added to NOTICE or LICENSE. [11] 3. We should: - place artefacts in correct release area (dist.apache.org, not a big deal) - no need for need for KEYS file inside artefact and in fact at that point it's too late to be of any real use. - year is wrong in NOTICE file Also for the binary convenience release: - It is missing DISCLAIMER - LICENSE and NOTICE are incorrect as: - NOTICE lists BSD and MIT software which should be in LICENSE - LICENSE is missing BSD/MIT and other bundled software - NOTICE includes software that is not bundled (e.g. junit + others) - NOTICE is probably missing item from bundled Apache license NOTICE files (e.g.karaf + others) [13] > Check legal files in preparation for the release > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: UNOMI-8 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-8 > Project: Apache Unomi > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Fix For: 1.0.0-incubating > > > Guidance: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)