Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-14 Thread Claude Brisson
About the tools, I think we should drop the jsp module. Nobody is maintaining it. On 14/02/2024 10:26, Claude Brisson wrote: Yes, thanks :-) On 13/02/2024 20:00, Michael Osipov wrote: On 2024/02/13 17:39:38 Claude Brisson wrote: Maybe it's nitpicking, but having the users being able to build

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-14 Thread Claude Brisson
Yes, thanks :-) On 13/02/2024 20:00, Michael Osipov wrote: On 2024/02/13 17:39:38 Claude Brisson wrote: Maybe it's nitpicking, but having the users being able to build without errors is a precaution which is worth repackaging an engine RC, since we're at it... no? I don't consider this as nitp

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Canceling the vote and dropping the release. It did not reach the required quorum. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Michael Osipov
On 2024/02/13 17:39:38 Claude Brisson wrote: > Maybe it's nitpicking, but having the users being able to build without > errors is a precaution which is worth repackaging an engine RC, since > we're at it... no? I don't consider this as nitpicking, but you need to consider the failure reason as

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Claude Brisson
Maybe it's nitpicking, but having the users being able to build without errors is a precaution which is worth repackaging an engine RC, since we're at it... no? On 13/02/2024 18:09, Michael Osipov wrote: On 2024/02/13 15:25:42 Claude Brisson wrote: Since I could not build the engine RC, I can

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Michael Osipov
On 2024/02/13 15:25:42 Claude Brisson wrote: > Since I could not build the engine RC, I cannot test the tools RC > without tweaking the poms. As a followup to your comments I found another issue for tests: https://github.com/apache/velocity-tools/pull/17 Though, it is not a blocker because it d

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Claude Brisson
Since I could not build the engine RC, I cannot test the tools RC without tweaking the poms. Usually, I first release the engine then the tools. Also, I think it is a good practice to name RC tags 2.4-rc1, etc. and to only tag the release with 2.4. Best,   Claude On 13/02/2024 14:35, Micha

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Guys, last day for votes. Please have a look. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-11 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2024-02-10 um 20:42 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, IMPORTANT: This requires the following staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1041/ Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310130&version=12351146 Stagi

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-10 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:42 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > IMPORTANT: This requires the following staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1041/ > > Release notes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310130&v

[VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-10 Thread Michael Osipov
Hi, IMPORTANT: This requires the following staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1041/ Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310130&version=12351146 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/r