a good excuse to figure out how the web site is
> generated and published, so I'll take a look at this one, as I
> understand at least the second part.
>
>
> Our second step is send out a message and shut down the general@ list.
>
> How does this sound?
>
> ===
as I
understand at least the second part.
Our second step is send out a message and shut down the general@ list.
How does this sound?
Subject: Discontinuing general@velocity mailing list. Switch to user@velocity.
Velocity community members:
We are shuttin
+1
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Frederick N. Brier
wrote:
> Sounds good to me :).
>
>
> On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>
>> And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list?
>> Something inherited from Jakarta? It's not archived or publicly
>> visible on nabb
Sounds good to me :).
On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list?
Something inherited from Jakarta? It's not archived or publicly
visible on nabble or mail-archive.com. Users have a difficult enough
time determining whether
And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list?
Something inherited from Jakarta? It's not archived or publicly
visible on nabble or mail-archive.com. Users have a difficult enough
time determining whether a posting should go to user@ and dev@. I
see nothing that differentiates
