On 16/01/2017 16:23, Claude Brisson wrote:
No one is currently taking care of Anakia any more. We've set its
status as "archived".
That being said, Anakia by itself is very small (12 source files), and
it should be quite easy to upgrade. This would consist in doing the
following:
1. Have
No one is currently taking care of Anakia any more. We've set its status
as "archived".
That being said, Anakia by itself is very small (12 source files), and
it should be quite easy to upgrade. This would consist in doing the
following:
1. Have Anakia support Velocity 2.0, which should be
Hi,
The Apache Incubator still uses Anakia to render the website. If you're saying
its not going to be possible to support it going forward, that seems reason
enough to move off.
John
On 2017-01-02 04:45 (-0500), Claude Brisson wrote:
> Yes, probably. But we could also
Yes, probably. But we could also let things as they are... Who does
still use Anakia?
On 02/01/2017 01:48, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Maybe double escaping would work?
lt;stylegt;
On 01/01/2017 04:04 PM, humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Author: humbedooh
Date: Sun Jan 1 21:04:11 2017
New Revision:
Maybe double escaping would work?
lt;stylegt;
On 01/01/2017 04:04 PM, humbed...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: humbedooh
> Date: Sun Jan 1 21:04:11 2017
> New Revision: 1776872
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776872=rev
> Log:
> this is breaking apache.org, work around.
>
> Modified: