+1 For a Velocity 1.8 branch, that sounds reasonable to me.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Mike Kienenberger
wrote:
> I think we should also upgrade the minimum java version required for
> Velocity if we create a 1.8 branch.
>
> [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in
>
I think we should also upgrade the minimum java version required for
Velocity if we create a 1.8 branch.
[javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in
conjunction with -source 1.4
[javac] warning: [options] source value 1.4 is obsolete and will
be removed in a future release
