Am 2019-06-03 um 08:02 schrieb Brent Putman:
On 6/1/19 12:25 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Yeah, adopting Spring support is unlikely to be much burden and seems well
worthwhile.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 1:48 AM Claude Brisson
wrote:
Hi.
We are aware of the situation, and we were more or less
On 6/1/19 12:25 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
> Yeah, adopting Spring support is unlikely to be much burden and seems well
> worthwhile.
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 1:48 AM Claude Brisson
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> We are aware of the situation, and we were more or less expecting
>> someone to make such a
On 6/2/19 2:06 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> wow, didn't expect Shibboleth still to be alive, I never understood
> this entire complexity if there is Kerberos and TLs cert auth which
> both served me well for the last 10 years at work.
It's been very much alive for over 15 years, very widely
Hi Brent,
Am 2019-06-01 um 02:32 schrieb Brent Putman:
Hello,
I represent the Shibboleth project (https://www.shibboleth.net/), a
widely-used open-source platform for federated authentication (SAML,
CAS, and soon OpenID Connect). We make heavy use of Velocity in our
codebase, as well as Spring
Yeah, adopting Spring support is unlikely to be much burden and seems well
worthwhile.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 1:48 AM Claude Brisson
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We are aware of the situation, and we were more or less expecting
> someone to make such a proposal. Yes, it will benefit both communities.
>
>
Hi.
We are aware of the situation, and we were more or less expecting
someone to make such a proposal. Yes, it will benefit both communities.
+1 for me. I guess that if your patch includes proper test cases,
support won't be problematic.
Claude
On 01/06/2019 02:32, Brent Putman wrote:
Hello,
I represent the Shibboleth project (https://www.shibboleth.net/), a
widely-used open-source platform for federated authentication (SAML,
CAS, and soon OpenID Connect). We make heavy use of Velocity in our
codebase, as well as Spring Framework and Spring MVC.
As you may know, in their v4.x
