Is wicket security going to be a big basket module?
I mean will be put wicket-auth-roles and swarm there too?
Just asking because swarm and wicket-auth-roles are also referred to
as wicket security and that might get a bit confusing.
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst
Before I start the vote on accepting the kitten auth software coming
from Thoof, we should discuss where to put the kitten auth components.
I see a couple of options:
[ ] extensions
[ ] separate project next to wicket-extensions/spring/ioc/velocity/etc
[ ] wicket security
So, let your voice be
I looked at it and I found
http://www.nabble.com/PagingNavigator-refactoring-request-td14783646.html#a14797267
After reading the thread, I understand. I'll refactor our code too.
Thanks and Regards
Stefan Simik
Stefan Simik wrote:
Hi Igor,
please, could you explain, why
how big is it?
Is it just 1 or 2 components?
then for extentions.
johan
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I start the vote on accepting the kitten auth software coming
from Thoof, we should discuss where to put the kitten auth components.
I
[ x ] extensions
if it doesn't have any external dependencies and Jonathan plans to
maintain the project.
[ x ] separate project next to wicket-extensions/spring/ioc/velocity/etc
if it does have external dependencies and Jonathan plans to maintain
the project.
[ x ] wicket stuff project
+1 on all accounts
-igor
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ x ] extensions
if it doesn't have any external dependencies and Jonathan plans to
maintain the project.
[ x ] separate project next to wicket-extensions/spring/ioc/velocity/etc
if
And +1 to that
Frank
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on all accounts
-igor
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ x ] extensions
if it doesn't have any external dependencies and Jonathan plans
+1 non binding. And the same as Eelco:)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
[ x ] extensions
if it doesn't have any external dependencies and Jonathan plans to
maintain the project.
[ x ] separate project next to wicket-extensions/spring/ioc/velocity/etc
if it does have external dependencies and
And now that we are at it, what are the rules for when which project
goes where, I've always been confused about it. What the rules for which
projects goes where, and im thinking of wicket stuff, wicket core,
wicket extensions, and something beside wicket extensions like spring,
auth roles
I think Maurice and I are also available for admin tasks etc... Btw..
We both took the pledge at some time:)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I've also upgraded jira to 3.12.3. This is the last stuff I do for a while
Martijn
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
Let me think ..
Was that the contract i signed to give up my soul or the one for my
first born ;)
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Maurice and I are also available for admin tasks etc... Btw..
We both took the
thats simple, as far as i know there is a contract that was signed when you
where born:
Maurice will do everything Johan tells him to do
yes your mom and dad already did know back then what would be good for you!
johan
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i will not promise to maintain this.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
[ x ] extensions
if it doesn't have any external dependencies and Jonathan plans to
maintain the project.
[ x ] separate project next to wicket-extensions/spring/ioc/velocity/etc
if it does have external dependencies
Thanks - turns out that doing that's not enough, as it's also added to
the list of MarkupFilterChains set in
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupParser, so it adds a
_relative_path_prefix_, causing a MarkupException: Unable to find
component... later!
As an alternative, I was able to get somewhere by
i will not promise to maintain this.
Ok. So unless someone else of the committers wants to take
responsibility for at least the first few months, I think it should
start as a wicket-stuff project. And if it turns out it is relatively
bug (and feature request) free, we can consider to migrate
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i will not promise to maintain this.
Ok. So unless someone else of the committers wants to take
responsibility for at least the first few months, I think it should
start as a wicket-stuff project. And if it turns
sounds smart to me.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
i will not promise to maintain this.
Ok. So unless someone else of the committers wants to take
responsibility for at least the first few months, I think it should
start as a wicket-stuff project. And if it turns out it is relatively
bug
17 matches
Mail list logo
