According to IBehavior.isTemporary() javadoc, behaviors that do Javascript
effects etc.
In which case should AbstractAjaxBehavior.isTemporary() return true ? Or is
there a valid reason for it to return false?
--
View this message in context:
crontab? Are you running linux? Wouldn't you just add entries
(symbolic links) to your runlevel's init scripts?
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a power failure, which caused the wicket-stuff server to reboot.
Unfortunately when it comes
freebsd I think. But for runlevel entries you need root acccess, which
Sebastiaan doesn't hand out (at least not without physical threats).
Martijn
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:59 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
crontab? Are you running linux? Wouldn't you just add entries
(symbolic
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freebsd I think. But for runlevel entries you need root acccess, which
Sebastiaan doesn't hand out (at least not without physical threats).
That's a good policy!
I was just saying that's not necessarily the solution to
But it would be really nice to have common libs that we could all depend
on. One problem is the wicket accordion contrib, if you use that in
conjunction with YUI contrib it falls apart. But then again im not sure
it would bring too much infrastructure.
Sven Meier wrote:
As the initiator of
Is wicket-accordion using YUI's javascript? Then perhaps it could have a
dependency on wicket-yui.
I agree that we should have common libs we can depend on. That's what
I'm trying to do with wicket-prototype.
I'm just arguing against utilizing the google loader or a single project
where we
Sven Meier wrote:
Is wicket-accordion using YUI's javascript? Then perhaps it could have
a dependency on wicket-yui.
Not directly, but the javascript behind are using it. So I could
probably depend on wicket-yui, I'll try it out if possible...
I agree that we should have common libs we can
