Yes, that should do as well
Juergen
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Erik van Oosten wrote:
> Can we not use just this TransparentMarkupContainer and add the
> atrtibutemodifiers to that component?
>
> Erik.
>
>
> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it is trivial. Just copy the code from the
Can we not use just this TransparentMarkupContainer and add the
atrtibutemodifiers to that component?
Erik.
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Yes, it is trivial. Just copy the code from the
TransparentMarkupContainer (still on my disk).
As another option: In 1.5 we removed the final keyword from
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Kenny MacLeod
wrote:
> I agree that it should be no means be the default setting, but in some cases
> you *know* your production environment does not serialize sessions.
>
> For example, we run in a JBoss cluster with Tomcat session replication
> disabled. Our ses
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Kenny MacLeod wrote:
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> 2) A modified AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory which gives the option of not
>>> creating CGLIB proxies for the injected Spring beans.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod wrote:
Hi there,
2) A modified AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory which gives the option of not
creating CGLIB proxies for the injected Spring beans. In deployment
environments where session serialization is not enabled, it seems an
I think this option can be applied if it deployment environment is checked.
--
Bruno
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been looking at the wicket-spring integration stuff, and I've come up
> with a couple of enhancements which I've found useful, and would be happy to
> contribute:
>
> 1) An enhanced SpringWebApplicationFactory which has th
Kenny, if you need some help, let me know.
Afterall I wan't to get myself back on the Wicket track. :-)
Cheers,
Bruno
PS: Jeremy, how's the flip-flops? :-D
File a JIRA and attach the patch. At least that way they won't get lost.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been looking at the wicket-spring integration stuff, and I've come up
> with a couple of enhanc
Hi there,
I've been looking at the wicket-spring integration stuff, and I've come
up with a couple of enhancements which I've found useful, and would be
happy to contribute:
1) An enhanced SpringWebApplicationFactory which has the capability of
creating and initializing its own Spring appco
10 matches
Mail list logo
