Decommissioning is probably a good thing. I know I sometimes get confused
between extensions/dateTime as to which one I'm using. But IIRC extensions
uses java.util.date and datetime uses joda. How are you going to rectify that
part of the merge?
Thanks,
Tom Burton
-Original
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/89
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user martin-g commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/89#issuecomment-73305327
Thank you, Tobias!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user klopfdreh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/89
WICKET-5828 PageProvider not serializable
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/klopfdreh/wicket WICKET-5828
Alternatively you can
I'm OK with that :)
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Andrea Del Bene an.delb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I half agree with this. We should move yui to wicketstuff but I'd rather
move the rest of datetime (few classes) under wicket-util.
One thing
Maybe it make sense to move
Please be more detailed when you have to say something.
Which classes ?
Why do you want to keep them around ?
Such minor useful things.
Thank you!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com
I half agree with this. We should move yui to wicketstuff but I'd rather
move the rest of datetime (few classes) under wicket-util.
One thing
Maybe it make sense to move org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui to wicketstuff
but leave org.apache.wicket.datetime as is?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:21 PM,
Yes of course :)
... and move the remaining YUI packages to wicketstuff-yui ?
Sven
On 06.02.2015 16:22, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This
is in short what I would do:
Remove:
... and move the remaining YUI packages to wicketstuff-yui ?
Sven
On 06.02.2015 16:22, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This
is in short what I would do:
Remove:
Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five classes:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/DateConverter.java
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/PatternDateConverter.java
I agree
Additionally wicket-jquery-ui extends DateTextField to provide date picker
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Andrea Del Bene an.delb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five
classes:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/
Hi Andrea,
IMHO the components belong into wicket-extensions. Note that we already
have a DateTextField there.
Regards
Sven
On 06.02.2015 13:56, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five
classes:
Hi devs,
Actually Wicket jQuery UI's DatePicker extends org.apache.wicket.
*extensions*.markup.html.form.DateTextField
By the way, Wicket Utils already have
org.apache.wicket.*util*.convert.converter.DateConverter.
I did not check the differences..
DateLabel PatternDateConverter are probably
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This is
in short what I would do:
Remove:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/DateConverter.java
Move to wicket-utils:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/PatternDateConverter.java
14 matches
Mail list logo
