[GitHub] wicket pull request: Build/wicket 7.0.0 m5

2015-03-19 Thread Fogetti
Github user Fogetti closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/110 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] wicket pull request: Build/wicket 7.0.0 m5

2015-03-19 Thread Fogetti
Github user Fogetti commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/110#issuecomment-83834367 I will close this PR since I created another below using rebase: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/111 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] wicket pull request: Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking Protection

2015-03-19 Thread Fogetti
GitHub user Fogetti opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/111 Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking Protection This pull request is to replace my previous attempt: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/110 Now I rebased my changes in my feature branch to

[GitHub] wicket pull request: Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking Protection

2015-03-19 Thread Fogetti
Github user Fogetti closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/111 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] wicket pull request: Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking Protection

2015-03-19 Thread Fogetti
GitHub user Fogetti opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/112 Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking Protection This pull request is to replace my previous attempt: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/110 Now I rebased my changes in my feature branch to

[GitHub] wicket pull request: Build/wicket 7.0.0 m5

2015-03-19 Thread martin-g
Github user martin-g commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/110#issuecomment-83664578 Thanks for the contribution! The problem with the 800 files is that you used branch `build/7.0.0-M5` instead of `master`. If you cannot rebase the commits

ApacheCon US 2015

2015-03-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Dear Apache enthusiast, In just a few weeks, we'll be holding ApacheCon in Austin, Texas, and we'd love to have you in attendance. You can save $300 on admission by registering NOW, since the early bird price ends on the 21st. Register at http://s.apache.org/acna2015-reg ApacheCon this year