Yes, I guess it's better to record this change. I'm on it.
On 19/06/2015 12:52, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Does it deserve a ticket so users know about the new feature ?
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Jun 19, 20
Does it deserve a ticket so users know about the new feature ?
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene
wrote:
> It was kind of "noisy" change but I think it's worth it ;-)
>
>
It was kind of "noisy" change but I think it's worth it ;-)
Agreed!
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:01 PM, andrea del bene
wrote:
Agree, but I'd rather move WicketTestCase under
org.apache
Thank you from me, too! Good to get an impression of a migration of a big
project.
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 19.06.2015 um 10:44 schrieb andrea del bene :
>
> Thank you Martijn. Looks quite smooth considering the size of the project :)
>
>> On 18/06/2015 18:22, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> My se
Thank you Martijn. Looks quite smooth considering the size of the project :)
On 18/06/2015 18:22, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
My second (big) project migration to Wicket 7 was just started this
afternoon, and consists of roughly 520K lines of Java code, and is
built against our internal wrapper fram
