It seems I've forgot to press the Release button for wicket-webjars:0.5.2
last night.
It is hurrying from Sonatype to Maven Central now.
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:38 AM,
Hi,
We deployed our first applications using 7.0.0-M6 in production yesterday
and we started to see the following 2 exceptions in our logs:
==
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument 'markup' may not be null.
at
Yes, the problems came with the work for component queueing.
I guess at some point someone will be able to reproduce the problem in a
quickstart and we will be able to debug and fix it. Until then use the
better solution (EnclosureContainer).
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Github user selckin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/114#discussion_r33139451
--- Diff:
wicket-guice/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/guice/GuiceFieldValueFactory.java
---
@@ -64,15 +68,34 @@ public Object getFieldValue(final Field
Nothing really fancy except for a transparent markup at the top of the page
and a wicket:enclosure.
I can't reproduce it, I just see the problem in the logs.
I'm starting to wonder if there is a concurrency issue somewhere (same
question I asked in my other post).
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:12
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/114
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
EnclosureContainer FTW!
P.S. I know the above is not very useful but I'm preaching against
(Inline)Enclosure for few years now :-)
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Guillaume Smet
Hi,
In production, yesterday, I had a very disturbing bug with an enclosure
(the wicket:enclosure tag): the content of the enclosure was displayed even
if the child was not visible (and the child was indeed not visible in the
page).
I switched to using an EnclosureContainer and redeployed the
No bell rung yet :-). Could you provide some more details about page's
components hierarchy?
On 24/06/2015 11:26, Guillaume Smet wrote:
Hi,
We deployed our first applications using 7.0.0-M6 in production yesterday
and we started to see the following 2 exceptions in our logs:
I think I have reproduced it locally but it's intermittent and really
weird. I can't get a way to reproduce it each time.
Is there a shared state between pages regarding the enclosures or the
component queueing (I mean for a given page class but different page
parameters)?
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/114#discussion_r33138716
--- Diff:
wicket-guice/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/guice/GuiceFieldValueFactory.java
---
@@ -64,15 +68,34 @@ public Object getFieldValue(final Field
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/114#discussion_r33141370
--- Diff:
wicket-guice/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/guice/GuiceFieldValueFactory.java
---
@@ -64,15 +68,34 @@ public Object getFieldValue(final Field
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
EnclosureContainer FTW!
P.S. I know the above is not very useful but I'm preaching against
(Inline)Enclosure for few years now :-)
Yeah, we only use it for very simple cases and we use EnclosureContainer
for
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.filter.EnclosureHandler this is the shared
state
It is both a IMarkupFilter (an application singleton) and
IComponentResolver (resolves components for wicket:enclosure)
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
Great! Could you share the code to investigate it?
Thank you.
On 24/06/2015 14:39, Guillaume Smet wrote:
I think I have reproduced it locally but it's intermittent and really
weird. I can't get a way to reproduce it each time.
Is there a shared state between pages regarding the enclosures or
Github user martin-g commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/129#issuecomment-114870115
It seems your branch is too far from current master. I have problems to
merge it locally.
Could you please rebase it and probably squash your commits into one?
GitHub user selckin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/130
WICKET-5935: Guice IoC: cache proxies fail fast
- cache proxies in the same way the spring ioc caches them
- If a bean has no binding the exception is now throw on construction
instead
Github user felipecalmeida commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/129#issuecomment-114936935
Sure!
I don't know how to do and I'm learning right now. My first time doing a
rebase. Just a minute or two.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user felipecalmeida commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/129#issuecomment-114941925
I think I did as expected. I hope.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
19 matches
Mail list logo
