done.
Why don't you do it yourself? you should have the credentials to do it!
johan
On 9/4/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, could someone pls update the examples on wicketstuff? The locale
switch for the forminput example doesn't work there, while that was
fixed quite some
+1
On 9/5/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
add Gerolf Seitz as committer
-igor
should set a date when we would run formatting on the
entire
codebase as well.
-igor
On 9/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it how it works now
and maybe some of us like Eelco don't need it. but as long as some
fine by me, who is going to do that at that time?
On 9/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh and BTW I'm still using Eclipse 3.2 that's why I was not seeing
the option.
Eclipse 3.2 is ss last year
But event then if there where a bit active userson IDEA
then still it is a good idea that the eclipse users do how we do it now
its way better then nothing..
Can IDEA not push it like eclipse?
johan
On 9/4/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, September 3, 2007, 9:38:50 PM, Eelco
I like it how it works now
and maybe some of us like Eelco don't need it. but as long as some others
don't do it as hard wired as he is. The auto cleanup/format of eclipse is
great
and should be kept on.
I am saying from day 1 that this should be a basic CVS/SVN or what ever you
use feature.
(so
i don't care to much, how much extra work is it for us?
can't we just have something where you can add levels what ever you want?
like FeedbackMessage.addLevel(new Level(, 10));
johan
On 8/31/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we need to have a vote on
ha... also my idea :)
On 8/31/07, Igor Vaynberg (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
refactor feedback to allow users to easily add custom levels
Key: WICKET-911
URL:
hmm that also doesn't fix it completely
i am also diving into this, it is pretty complex now when you also take the
wicket servlet into account :(
On 8/29/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that fixed it.
Eelco
On 8/28/07, Jan Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll
it should be fixed now (lastmodified request/application thread local sets
and that maybe in combination with a WicketServlet)
On 8/29/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm that also doesn't fix it completely
i am also diving into this, it is pretty complex now when you also take
Release
On 8/21/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 release to my
people.apache.org account. Updates are:
- updated copyright info in the notice.txt file (Frank)
- archetype source is now included in the distribution, so it
I made some patches to the current browserinfo page to get the right
timezone..
This is still not completely right because we just guess the timezone on the
2 properties we get from the browser:
The offset that the browser reports for 1 jan and the offset it reports for
the 1 of jul.
What the
yeah beta2 is quite a long time ago, lets release something..
and try to finish 1.2 up then
johan
On 8/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we have over 100 issues fixed for 1.3-beta3... Shall we just release
the bugger and assign the remaining outstanding issues to beta4?
sounds fine
On 8/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive noticed something interesting just now
lets say you add a header contributor to a component. then call
setenabled(false) on that component. guess what - bam - no header
contributor. this is because
AbstractBehavior.java
imho this shouldve been the default java convention. it takes more thought
and analysis to design something to be overridable.
don't know about that, i think i would have hit my head against the wall way
way more often
then i do now. Sometimes i just HAVE to override behavior of swing
try to run in on jdk 1.4 then it will fail.. :)
but with 1.5 sun has changed the reflection spec for final fields AGAIN
(changed now several times)
johan
On 8/16/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I was creating a test case for the property model to do some mind
if maven can do that try it out..
johan
On 7/30/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what the status of version ranges is, but shouldn't we rather
bind to 1.4 and let maven use the most recent bugfix release?
Martijn
On 7/30/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
401 - 417 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
